RE: [-empyre-] the heart of the matter
Patrick - what about models like for example the Dynamic Recurrent
Neural Network (Randy Beer's model)? Also since these can, and
most often are, implemented as simulations on standard von-neumann
digital discrete systems - what's the difference between the
hardware implementation and the digital simulation (provided say
both are embodied in a "real world" robot)?
Quoting patrick lichty <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> The most reductive way to put it would be to argue that the two are not
> analogous to one another.
> My understanding is that although there is a processing involved, but we
> could discuss the definition of information, processing, etc., and the
> nature of cognition vs. data processing (i.e. digital computation). I
> feel that the processes are so fundamentally different, that to make
> analogues between the two is problematic at best.
> Part of my argument is that if one has a hammer, everything looks like a
> nail. We use computers now, and my contention is that much looks like
> data to us.
> A question back: can there be a thing such as
> non-qualitative/non-discrete computing? I used to program analog
> computers, but I am thinking about qualitative computing, but not
> analog. Consider that I might be suggesting a complete break with
> silicon computing here. It might be an application for biocomputing.
> Patrick Lichty
> Intelligent Agent Magazine
> 1556 Clough Street, #28
> Bowling Green, OH 43402
> 225 288 5813
> "It is better to die on your feet
> than to live on your knees."
> -----Original Message-----
> From: email@example.com
> [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On Behalf Of Jim Andrews
> Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2004 3:46 PM
> To: soft_skinned_space
> Subject: RE: [-empyre-] the heart of the matter
> hi patrick,
> what does it mean to say "human thought... is not akin to digital
> computation at all."
> empyre forum
> empyre forum
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and