Re: [-empyre-] Defining metacreation...
re. Metacreation... the term is stirring up some reaction; below is
a grab from [spectre] which briefly explains my intended meaning..
Another context here is Alan Kay's 1984 paper "Software" (Scientific
American Special Issue on Computers) where he described computational
process as a metamedium (since it can simulate many existing media as
well as create new ones). Kay likes the prefix meta- though it hasn't
caught on in the mainstream - he's also applied it to the ground-breaking
operating system - Smalltalk. There's also the contemporary use of the
word in the internet usage: Metadata is information-about-information.
Also I find (Aliette's?) comment that the term as used by Mitchell is
abusive unacceptable. It infers that human creation is impossible to
follow or improve on - implying it is (or humans themselves are) in some
special, supreme (or worse - hallowed) position. This is an arrogant
assumption reeking of theocratic dogma and should be questioned.
Humans will eventually become either extinct or obsolete - there is
no doubt about this. If we want the concept of live to survive in the
universe we should emphasize the creation of our successors.
Paul Brown PO Box 413, Cotton Tree QLD 4558, Australia
mob 0419 72 74 85 fax +1 309 216 9900
Visiting Fellow - Birkbeck http://www.bbk.ac.uk/hafvm/cache/
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and