Re: [-empyre-] emergence, embodiment, biology
On 10/11/2004, at 8:21 AM, Paul Brown wrote:
Adrian's original experimental rig only worked in one specific location
if he moved it a few centimetres along the bench it stopped. He
discovered that there was a power cable embedded in the wall at the
original location and that the evolved circuit was "stealing" the mains
impedance frequency as an input. This example convinced me of the
importance of embodiment in AI and alife.
And I think this insight also relates to some of what Aliette has
posted re. alternatives to Darwinian evolutionary biology. For the
record I'm as suspicious of Dawkins-style genocentrism as anyone, and I
find approaches such as Margulis' symbiogenesis far more appealing.
It's also clear from my resesarch that in a-life in general, and most
a-life art, the question of embryogenesis and genetic expression - the
"wet" end of genetics - is put in the "too hard" basket.
Thompson's experiments and other embodied approaches (even in
software!) are powerful counter-examples. The richness of their
approach is actually aesthetically as well as formally evident... I'm
thinking here of the work of Annunziato (http://www.plancton.com/) and
Driessens and Verstappen (http://www.xs4all.nl/~notnot); works using
cellular automata (like Paul's) also offer an alternative to the
"organism = gene = code" fallacy.
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and