Re: [-empyre-] Sublime
Thank you Mitchell, I felt the same but couldn't write it down.
I appreciate your clear thinking.
I would like to know from you, how do you experience the difference
when presenting your work with and without the interactivity?
I have the impression from what I see on your website that some of your
works have a static output in the form of high resolution prints and
a dynamic real time version with user interaction.
How do you choose what to present in a certain context? What is the
difference in reaction from the audience to the different media.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mitchell Whitelaw" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: "soft_skinned_space" <email@example.com>
Sent: vrijdag 26 november 2004 0:04
Subject: Re: [-empyre-] Sublime
> On 25/11/2004, at 11:50 AM, Christina McPhee wrote:
> > How might this
> > spiritually organic art, both natural and beyond nature, cast a gloss
> > on
> > Jevbratt's desire for a creative work that will instigates "intuitive
> > understandings of the data", while still instantiating your own
> > interest in
> > abstraction and miniaturization: big data in a petri dish? Interested
> > in
> > your further musings.
> I've been puzzling over this... I think that (in current practice
> anyway) a-life/generative and data.art represent complementary
> approaches to thinking complexity. Data.art has an empirical bent,
> filtering and manipulating data from outside systems. A-life/generative
> processes seem to be fundamentally synthetic. They might have similar
> outcomes, in terms of evoking some kind of intuition of real complex
> systems, but one works from the outside in, seeking the system in the
> data, while the other works from the inside out (or bottom up),
> building a system and observing its behaviour.
> Of course it's possible to use an artificial system, such as an a-life
> "world", as a source for data visualisation / sonification. Lovell and
> Mitchell did this in their work EIDEA - they traced the paths of
> creatures in an artificial ecosystem, and made "sand paintings" from
> the accumulated paths, which revealed long-term behaviours and dynamics
> of the system. This seems quite different to recent data.art though,
> where the data source is always something "real" "out there".
> empyre forum
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and