Re: [-empyre-] questions

    'after "duchamp's dunny" (according to artpup) I could do a (dogpoo) in
    the corner and call it art. But would it be good art?'

It has nothing to do with "good" or "bad" art, but rather context.
Duchamp put everyday (signed) objects in an art context, which made the
objects "art," just because he said so.

This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and MHonArc 2.6.8.