RE: [-empyre-] "know that control will be chosen"
- To: soft_skinned_space <email@example.com>
- Subject: RE: [-empyre-] "know that control will be chosen"
- From: Deborah Kelly <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:28:04 -0800 (PST)
- Delivered-to: email@example.com
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=L+qUM7oU002A99lTp3MuCWdTKgYiQR7jk/nio1430na33HbSouWXYocDkwroTMvydJk3UjvVNb08gNwHoEj8Tgw5YWB/DMdkxSmAcSpLdNdYqobwe32N153Pf09OEO5NiC+xvPlLsvgoO7EjcHIppc9scpkaCUuCcKd36AB9wBU= ;
- In-reply-to: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Reply-to: soft_skinned_space <email@example.com>
here's the rub, for me: I have, for instance, a
perfectly coherent foreign policy plotted out, my
spies chosen, my intrigues, wars and cocktail parties-
and yet! Lord Poppycock continues to utterly dominate
--- Nicholas Ruiz <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Greetings Deborah/all,
> It is a challenge, and a responsibility of thought,
> to consider what we are
> thinking about in its fullness. To criticize, the
> control of 'going apart,'
> in thought, a 'going apart' from such a 'control
> society,' carries within
> the art of such action the implicit acceptance of
> control of some kind;
> because there is no such space of total entropy. To
> speak of control or its
> excess is to acknowledge and embody its prescience,
> in which, we all have a
> hand, in terms of its direction and intensity,
> regardless of our station.
> In the end, after the celebration of critique, we
> must choose our control,
> or quite simply, know that control will be chosen
> for us, no?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: email@example.com
> [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On
> Behalf Of Deborah Kelly
> Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 7:50 AM
> To: soft_skinned_space
> Subject: RE: [-empyre-] "a politically realist
> greetings, Empyre and guests.
> In response to Nicholas Ruiz the third,
> please forgive me if I misunderstand:
> why do I need to determine how much martial control
> nation should have or exert, if I dare to question
> that control &, say, its mechanisms?
> I'm not standing for election. No-one with their
> on, or anywhere near, that kind of power is ever
> to ask me my opinion.
> I don't think it is irresponsible to ask questions
> when you don't know the answers.
> empyre forum
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and