[-empyre-] "Hactivating" and the Screw-Up

sam-myspinach sam at myspinach.org
Sat Dec 12 12:53:03 EST 2009


Hi there,

I wonder if anyone can do some research and analysis on this - I am  
too frightened:

http://www.cocacolazero.com/index.jsp#/facialprofiler/

Thanks, Sam.





On 10/12/2009, at 1:40 PM, Kevin Hamilton wrote:

> Christina and all,
>
> In any of the advertising for personal music devices or cell phones,
> listeners experience private pleasure through the knowing smile, and
> perhaps a look up and to the right.
>
> This I would contrast to what actually happens when one reads or hears
> something funny when in public. For example, me on the bus this
> morning reading this line from Christina:
>
> On Dec 9, 2009, at 1:15 AM, Christina McPhee wrote:
>
>> The mistake is the beginning of the mutation.   "In the still cave of
>> the witch poesy... "
>
> Laughing out loud amongst silent commuters, nervous about where to put
> my smile and body.
>
> I'm thinking about all this partly in light of some conversation over
> on IDC right now, between Brian Holmes and myself, a few others. As an
> instructor, I'm more and more aware of how my students arrive already
> trained, configured into a cybernetic matrix. For many of them, their
> senses are only sensors, ready to accept symbolic input for the
> production of expected actions. (Hell, I'm not much better.) No
> documentary is going to reveal the truth for them, there's no
> narrative moment waiting for them. They need a new sensory experience,
> to have they eyeballs and eardrums reconfigured in a non-programmatic
> way.
>
> The cyberneticist I've been researching, Heinz von Foerster, was a
> magician. Literally. Back in the sixties and seventies he would do
> magic tricks for the students as part of his lectures on
> consciousness. I'm looking for some tricks like that, through the
> linguistic and the visual.
>
> Thus the word games. Searching for ways to use language that produce
> transformation without resorting to instrumental manipulation.
>
> A typology of wordsmiths, magicians of meaning...
>
> Words that could mean anything but which make us all think we're
> thinking the same thing.
> [Sarah Palin]
>
> Words that can mean two things, and everyone's in on the joke.
> [Stephen Colbert]
>
> [Bottom (from A Midsummer Night's Dream)]
> Words that mean one thing to the speaker and a different thing to the
> listener, but only the listener is in on the joke.
>
> Words that can mean more than one thing and no one knows which one is
> right, producing a plenitude of meaning.
> [Stoppard? I don't know, this one is just thrilling though.]
>
> One such overflow that just thrills me in this way is the piece "A
> Letter to Queen Victoria: The Sundance Kid is Beautiful" by Robert
> Wilson and Christopher Knowles.
>
> http://ubu.artmob.ca/sound/dial_a_poem_poets/big_ego/Big_Ego_05-wilson.mp3
>
> But I don't know much about it, and frankly I'm a little unsure about
> the politics of how this autistic poet Knowles came to work with
> Wilson. But there's some overflow here, some linguistic plenitude
> through some mistakes and misapprehension.
>
> Kevin
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> empyre forum
> empyre at lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au
> http://www.subtle.net/empyre
>



More information about the empyre mailing list