[-empyre-] critical motion nowhere and everywhere at some time
rtf9 at cornell.edu
Thu May 14 05:46:23 EST 2009
We are very pleased that you are raising the question of "critical
motion," which we anticipate that you'll address when you join us as
featured guest next weeks.
We have to say that we share your concern about the potential
downside of "closed discourse" and have been very happy by the broad
participation of the first week, which included posts from many
-empyre- members from whom we haven't heard in a while, as well as
very engaged posts by newly featured guests, Stamatia, Ashley, and
Erin. While it is true that the work and approach of the first
week's guests tends to be philosophical, we have designed the month
around four weeks of featured guests, all of whom work in very
different ways and with very different discourses. Our hope is that
their layerings will accrue an exciting "critical motion" of its own.
(One of this week's featured guests, Stelarc, ends up being in global
transit which will delay his presence a bit).
Because we recognize that many empyreans aren't always going to have
focused time to digest particiularly detailed posts, we continue to
archive -empyre- for future consultation. The archive URL is:
https://mail.cofa.unsw.edu.au/pipermail/empyre/ We're now designing
a better homepage that will make the archives more readily accessible.
We've been delighted to read not only about our guests' philosophical
approaches to motion but also about the very concrete artistic
practices and interventions discussed, from Erin and Ashley's
practices to those by Sally Jane, Alan, etc. Like you, we will
welcome further reflection on the "criticality" of motion as the
month progresses, and we look forward to how you'll be articulating
this next week.
Renate and Tim
>I was in a production workshop over the last 10 days and am barely
>able to shift energies now from physical work and computing/editing
>to the reading of such a highly complex and philosophical debate
>that we have had here.
> I could not read the debate in a linear way, as it began,
>with Stamatia and Ashkey lighting out, and Erin following.
>Then i got to a point where i did not want to read further. Did
>anyone else have this
> The discourse, I began so sense, was becoming less than
>particpatory, but i could be wrong. ?? I am sorry if I
>What readership, Norah, was invited, in your work?
>with many regards
>artistic director, DAP Lab
>School of Arts
>UB8 3PH UK
>empyre at lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au
> Renate Ferro and Tim Murray
> Co-Moderators, -empyre- a soft-skinned-space
> Department of Art/ Rose Goldsen Archive of New Media Art
> Cornell University
More information about the empyre