[-empyre-] Olive Oil
marloes at goto10.org
marloes at goto10.org
Tue Apr 6 07:27:09 EST 2010
> Quoting christopher sullivan <csulli at saic.edu>:
> see there is method to my olive oil madness, it does open up some doors.
I guess my beef about decentralization, is when it is described as the
only possible evolution of creative work. It is a mode, and a valid one,
but not the only avenue.
Decentralization has many different meanings and implementations in
different fields. In the field of collaborative (software) development,
decentralization through a distributed code repository actually means
artists/coders are not building one central project/cathedral together but
are free to copy or fork it (or part of it) and can choose to take parts
and build something new, contribute to the main project, simply own the
cloned project, etc.
> Cathedrals, like all great wonders of the world, where built by
> slaves. I love to walk in them though. My films are more like the one
carving in the corner, that is part of the cathedral, but there are of
course other vouces in my carvings, but I do control them very
> much..There is room for many models of creative work, and democracy do
not have to enter every aspect of life, or art. I play guitar, but
watching Chet Atkins and Mark Knopfler play together, is a pleasure in
audience, I do not have to jump on stage..
I agree, you do not have to jump! It does not make sense to talk about
decentralization or distributed systems in creative processes when
referring to solo artists (perhaps only when talking about distribution of
creative output). The context was collaborative practice (and such
practice naturally only makes sense for certain types of work).
> an open source worst case scenario is the very odd Elephants dream. the
result of decentralization to the point of creating an animation like,
narrative like, creation that ends up being about nothing.
The movie is made by a core team of 6 (selected) people. It was not
produced in a decentralized way at all as far as I know. The "openness" of
the movie only refers to the (mostly) open source tools used in its
creation, not the way the content was developed. I guess this is another
example of "open" being a really confusing and wrong word to use in front
of anything else except door. It is very fashionable though (but
seriously, it means nothing unless you define it clearly).
More information about the empyre