[-empyre-] this month's discussion on wearables, distributed
swht at clear.net.nz
Thu Jun 2 09:12:08 EST 2011
As an observer of the discussion, certain of its aspects interested me
very much, for instance the notions of performance, style, and fashion
as it both captures clothing design and takes it on its line of flight;
but what, apart from a lack of time to engage, led me not to, was the
near absence of any criticality vis-a-vis the topic, a kind of felt
overlay, making it difficult to see or feel distinct shapes, cushioning
angles, softening contours, padding arguments, such that Van Dyk's
intervention came as a relief ... from all of the relief, the anodyne.
But then at that point all that could be a heard was a dull thud: a
thimble fell to the rubberized carpet from a soft table, its impact
entirely absorbed, in a soundproof workspace as far away from the
sweatshops as it is possible to get.
On 02/06/11 02:15, Johannes Birringer wrote:
> dear all
> well, it's been announced the month's discussion is nearly or practically over,
> and one already has a sense that for some reason the discussion didn't come together,
> or discussants posted and left/did not return, some returned but it felt we were not
> having a conversation, or debate on some of the issues proposed between us, from the beginning,
> is this just my impression, or do others feel the same?
> what made this month's discussion difficult, in your opinion?
> with regards
> empyre forum
> empyre at lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au
More information about the empyre