[-empyre-] musings from the edge of scientific knowledge
eastwest at q.com
Thu Oct 27 06:29:23 EST 2011
Thanks you so much Akram for this thought provoking post. I have been convinced for years that physics has so much to offer artists, and I have liked reading about the intersection of art and physics, wherever I find those physicists who can make their very technical world available to readers at large, and to perspectives on spirituality and the human also.
I'm saving your post because I have learned so much from you here, and now I want to choreograph a work called. "What's the Matter with Antimatter"? I am so fascinated with the idea you present- that through asymmetry in the early universe, the laws of nature were biased toward matter, which is a explanation of how we are here as a very symphony of matter, or I might want to say, a symphony that continues to matter. I am also reminded that "matter" is the basis for our word "mother." I wrote about the mattering of ourselves through the maternal, material, matter, materia, of the mother in Dancing Identity: Metaphysics in Motion.
I get a bit out of the box though, because I turn toward the great mother mythological concepts of the divine feminine, and the many names of the divine mother in various cultures. Interesting how one can morph from physics to mythology. Artists have this freedom, I think. Maybe physicists do also. I don't know. You scientists probably have to keep your jobs, and not get to crazy.
On Oct 26, 2011, at 2:44 AM, Akram Khan wrote:
> It is not with a little trepidation that I make my first posting; during the past few weeks I have found these thought-provoking discussions, at times, floating over my scientific head.
> As a particle physicist my professional career has been all about a constant iterative process of formulating fundamental questions so that they are most amenable to being solved: Of what is the universe made? How did it all begin? What’ll be its ultimate fate?
> In my opinion here are some of the most critical questions which if answered will lead to a complete transformation of our understanding of what we are and of our place in the universe.
> 1) If the Universe began with the Big Bang – what happened to the antimatter that ought to have been there? .i.e. what is the matter with antimatter? Through an asymmetry in the early universe the laws of nature were biased towards matter, which is why we are here at all but why?
> 2) What are the ultimate constituents of matter? We start off with rainbows, molecules, atoms, electrons, neutrons and protons. The protons and neutrons as made of “quarks”, two different types. So, the smallest experimentally observed entities of matter are: electrons; muons, taus , neutrinos and the six quarks [plus their antimatter partners]. This begs the question, is there another deeper, more fundamental level of reality not yet seen? And the answer is maybe! Instead of thinking about particles being the DNA or fundamental building blocks of our universe, might these not be oscillating fundamental strings, where each harmonic of the string corresponds to a particular known particle; with each of us being a very symphony of such notes.
> 3) What is the nature of mass? And it is here that the hypothetical Higgs particle steps into the limelight.
> 4) Do we live in a multidimensional universe of which we only see the four dimensions of spacetime?
> 5) Is ours but one of many worlds or ‘membranes’ floating through the ‘Bulk’?
> 6) What is the basic nature of time?
> There are many more questions still but I fear this contribution is in imminent danger of morphing beyond manageable bounds...and the intention was but to provoke some dialogue. Please feel free to choose any topic that you’d like us to start exploring...... further thoughts I will post anon...
> best wishes
> empyre forum
> empyre at lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the empyre