[-empyre-] musings from the edge of scientific knowledge

lgm at theorbiolchem.org lgm at theorbiolchem.org
Thu Oct 27 04:28:49 EST 2011

Let me have a suggestion: before anyone tries to formulate any concept  
regarding antimatter, one must study - I mean study - thermodynamics.  
One must go through all basic laws and, for instance, try to seak some  
way of integrating the laws of entropy and the concept of big bang.  
All other approch is just to further mystify physics, as it has been  
been done in the last one hundred years...


Quoting Akram Khan <Akram.Khan at brunel.ac.uk>:

> It is not with a little trepidation that I make my first posting;  
> during the past few weeks I have found these thought-provoking  
> discussions, at times, floating over my scientific head.
> As a particle physicist my professional career has been all about a  
> constant iterative process of formulating fundamental questions so  
> that they are most amenable to being solved: Of what is the universe  
> made? How did it all begin? What’ll be its ultimate fate?
> In my opinion here are some of the most critical questions which if  
> answered  will lead to a complete transformation of our  
> understanding of what we are and of our place in the universe.
> 1) If the Universe began with the Big Bang – what happened to the  
> antimatter that ought to have been there? .i.e. what is the matter  
> with antimatter? Through an asymmetry in the early universe the laws  
> of nature were biased towards matter, which is why we are here at  
> all but why?
> 2) What are the ultimate constituents of matter? We start off with  
> rainbows, molecules, atoms, electrons, neutrons and protons.  The  
> protons and neutrons as made of “quarks”, two different types. So,  
> the smallest experimentally observed entities of matter are:   
> electrons;  muons,  taus , neutrinos and the six quarks [plus their  
> antimatter partners].  This begs the question, is there another  
> deeper, more fundamental level of reality not yet seen? And the  
> answer is maybe! Instead of thinking about particles being the DNA  
> or fundamental building blocks of our universe, might these not be  
> oscillating fundamental strings, where each harmonic of the string  
> corresponds to a particular known particle; with each of us being a  
> very symphony of such notes.
> 3) What is the nature of mass? And it is here that the hypothetical  
> Higgs particle steps into the limelight.
> 4) Do we live in a multidimensional universe of which we only see  
> the four dimensions of spacetime?
> 5)  Is ours but one of many worlds or ‘membranes’ floating through  
> the ‘Bulk’?
> 6) What is the basic nature of time?
> There are many more questions still but I fear this contribution is  
> in imminent danger of morphing beyond manageable bounds...and the  
> intention was but to provoke some dialogue.  Please feel free to  
> choose any topic that you’d like us to start exploring...... further  
> thoughts I will post anon...
> best wishes
> akram
> _______________________________________________
> empyre forum
> empyre at lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au
> http://www.subtle.net/empyre

More information about the empyre mailing list