[-empyre-] Welcome to empyre Week 4:Rethinking Curatorial Options: Globally
lakeeren at lakeerengallery.com
Fri Apr 27 05:02:25 EST 2012
Greetings from Mumbai !
Thank you for your invitation to join this engaging discussion Renate and
Tim. I do apologize for jumping in so late. I think the issues raised here
regards the “curatorial and social considerations” that impact the
"cultural, political, and theoretical reception of artistic practice,"
work within the sanctioned spaces of museums and galleries,” is tied into
To recount this from a curatorial faux-pas *Paris- Delhi- Mumbai*( An
exhibition between French and Indian artists), Summer 2011 at the Pompidou
in Paris. Not sure if anyone saw it …but it was appalling given that *Magiciens
de la Terre* took place in the same venue 22 years ago. Given documenta 11
and other noted exhibitions… to see an information booth at the heart of
the exhibit “selling India” supporting material in the form of maps,
statistical census data and bollywood movies and songs…was unpalatable.
Also several of the French artist refused to visit India as it would
disturb their notion of the way they visualized India… was unaceptable.
What is santioned within museums spaces in relation to our shared histories
and politics in terms of “otherness” needs to questioned( why can’t this be
a collaborative process for example). What head way have we made into
“curating cultures” and de-bunking the Eurocentric gaze?
Sorry about this rant but more to follow soon….
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Sarah Cook
<sarah.e.cook at sunderland.ac.uk>wrote:
> Dear Empyre readers
> Thank you for the invitation to participate in the discussion this
> month/week and apologies to come to it so late. It's been raining
> bucketloads over here in the UK (true to form for April), and we're all
> feeling a little under the weather.
> Of the (albeit quite wide-ranging) questions raised by Renate and Tim so
> far, the first three are most relevant to my work as a curator who works in
> collaboration (or adjunct to) other
> institutions/organisations/museums/galleries from my base as a researcher
> within a university research unit. Some rambling thoughts thus follow....
> On 24 Apr 2012, at 01:54, Renate Ferro wrote:
> > "How do curatorial and social considerations impact the cultural,
> > political, and theoretical reception of artistic practice?
> We've seen in the last few weeks both here now and on the CRUMB list an
> ongoing discussion about 'new aesthetics' (and don't worry, this post isn't
> about that) so perhaps it bears saying out loud that online activities,
> such as tumblr-blogging, taken as a curatorial form of activity (curating
> in the sense that Saul Albert has claimed with the University of Openess,
> as making research social, or socialising one's research), therefore does
> impact on the theoretical reception of artistic practice. Curating is a way
> of bringing things to light, of exposing new ways of seeing the world, and
> to that end it doesn't much matter who does it or where it is done, or even
> what it is about, so long as debate follows from or with it. Christiane
> pointed this out in her original post about the spaces of curation, that
> the different kind of spaces in which the practice or outputs of the
> curatorial process takes place (coincident, aligned, or not) might
> determine the kind or nature of its rece
> ption (museum shows reviewed in the NYTimes, online commissions reviewed
> on blogs). So maybe it makes a certain sense that a photo blog about an
> observable aesthetic change is thus hotly discussed in other casual but
> social opinionated places such as comment threads? An interesting reference
> point here might be the show which Annet Dekker worked on at the (*sigh*
> then supported) NIMK in Amsterdam called 'Versions' (
> http://nimk.nl/eng//versions) -- commenting as a form of artistic
> practice itself - how do you curate that without commenting on it?
> Renate's second question:
> What role does positioning work within the sanctioned spaces of museums
> and galleries or the non-sanctioned public or personal spaces have on both
> artistic and curatorial practice?
> What Christiane rightly identified, that "the provision of context" is "an
> essential part of curating" is the trickier thing to describe or analyse,
> as for every kind of thing one might want to curate, there might be a
> different responsibility to the context that needs to be provided. And it
> is not always the default context of art history. (I'm not sure why I feel
> the need to write that, but there you go).
> For instance (given the discussion in the last few posts about art and
> science), at the moment I am engaged with the exhibition Mirror Neurons
> which I have curated for the National Glass Centre here at the University
> of Sunderland.
> The exhibition includes six projects by a range of artists, but all the
> works on view invite the viewer to slow down and recognise that something
> is happening, or figure something out (if you have time to kill or are
> especially curious you can watch an unscripted 20 minute video walkthrough
> of the show, with me talking about the works, thanks to the efforts of a
> journalism student:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MYOCQJqsnwM&feature=youtu.be). I have hung
> this collection of works, so to speak, on the idea of the mirror neuron, a
> contestable concept in neuroscience that visual recognition and imitation
> of action plays a part in learning. With interactive, responsive or
> participatory art (as some of the works in the exhibition might be
> described) viewers often watch someone else participate and then imitate
> that behaviour (when it is their turn) consciously or not. Because the
> exhibition has a scientific idea in its title, and includes works which ask
> the viewer's participation,
> some of which the artists made in collaboration with scientists (such as
> Catherine Richard's work I was Scared to Death..., made with vacuum
> physicists at the National Research Council of Canada), there is a
> responsibility on my part to explain that context in the interpretation of
> the works. This is especially the case in the work of Simon Pope, which is
> an empty gallery, activated by the gallery visitor, following an
> instruction left in the title of the work, based on his collaboration with
> a psychologist researching memory. Phew!
> Yet because the exhibition takes place in a Glass Centre and includes
> works made using scientific glassware, there is an assumption that visitors
> will be aware of that context of the work's production as well, even if
> glass is not the important thing about the idea of the work (it might be
> part of its medium and nothing more).
> And then because the exhibition was curated to coincide with the AV
> Festival 2012, the theme of which was Slowness, and runs through this
> weekend's internationally recognised 'Slow Art Day', there is another
> context to put forward through my pairings of art works, about the
> perception of time, and personal constructions of time-based experiences
> (so the 2003, 15-minute, superimposed version of Michael Snow's film
> Wavelength - WVLNT - is playing in the gallery in the show, while for Slow
> Art Day, we're screening the original 1967 45-minute 16mm version).
> That's a lot of different contexts to get across in a single group
> exhibition. Hopefully what Christiane again called a 'deep crosslinking of
> ideas', which means, as curator, I have to be able to talk about the
> exhibition and the works in it to a range of people (to the radio
> journalist who just phoned, for instance) in a wide variety of
> vocabularies. What Beryl commented on, in terms of 'constantly adjusting' -
> in her case the content of the MA Curating course to respond to different
> interests of the students - has always been true of the practice of
> curating contemporary art. As I learned quite early on, one has to read
> both Vanity Fair and The New Scientist to get through an average art world
> opening dinner party. Recognising your audience's interests and moving
> conversations from there back to the art work, and the implications or
> resonances of that art work for their understanding of the world, is one
> real challenge for curators.
> So lastly, to Renate's third question:
> How do global histories, customs, and politics inform this positioning?
> I suspect I have no idea! It must surely be case-by-case, as you can not
> really separate an analysis of the practice of curating from the thing
> (object or not) you are curating. Each work will have its own context in
> terms of its history, custom, politics, etc. whether decided by its maker,
> or its medium, or its site, etc., and as a curator you might have to sift
> and decide which is the important one to highlight, to describe, to allow a
> way in to, and which can be put aside at this moment. Hence you have
> artists complaining that you didn't put their work into your show about X
> because their work is _all about_ X, when you'd looked at their work and
> thought it was much more about Y. We can only be responsible to our own
> bodies of knowledge, and be responsible for widening them whenever
> possible. While it might be unprofessional (unethical?) of me to misinform
> the public about what a mirror neuron is, I might be forgiven for doing so
> as I do not claim to be a neuroscientist, a
> nd this is an art exhibition not a scientific conference paper. But if I
> position myself as a curator, who has subjectively chosen a range of art
> works, and worked hard to present them to their best, because I think that
> together they add to a discussion you as a viewer might be interested in
> (perhaps how the act of visiting an exhibition can make us self-conscious
> or engender greater awareness of our role as 'receivers' of art), then at
> least I have been clear about my position without overly interfering in the
> art work and the artist's own intentions.
> Apologies for the ramble, but I look forward to discussing any of these
> ideas about the what=where=when=how of curating with you all ... and yes,
> those equal signs are deliberate ;-)
> empyre forum
> empyre at lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au
L AK E E R E N
6/18, Grants Blg, 2nd Floor, Opposite Basilico Restaurant, Arthur Bunder
Road, Colaba, Mumbai 400005. T: + 91-22 65224179.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the empyre