[-empyre-] incompatible research practices - week 03 - feedback & control // language & curating
magnus at ditch.org.uk
Wed Feb 22 09:29:29 EST 2012
Hello Magda and all,
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 06:52:31PM +0000, Magda Tyzlik-Carver wrote:
> Hello all and thank you Menotti for invitation and introduction.
> The Noise discussion, I see, is developing in interesting direction so
> I guess my contribution to the list might veer away from it, thus
> perhaps becoming a bit of noise in itself. However, encouraged by
> Marie’s research, I might proceed anyway.
> My contribution to the in/compatible seminar at transmediale was not in
> presenting my own research, which is also practice-based, but in
> co-moderating a panel discussion in which we were asked to return to
> the question of artistic research and its presumed in/compatibility
> within an academic and research context. So I would like to start from
> that and follow this direction, hoping some of you might want to
> I have to admit that my general response to this subject is that of
> impatience with the fact that in practice-based PhDs we are constantly
> asked not just to articulate our method, but the concern is to validate
> it as a method at the same time. And of course the first
> in/compatibility is how such a validation occurs, especially when
> situated versus the scientific research and its methods.
More information about the empyre