[-empyre-] The New Aesthetic - questions and conclusions
simon at littlepig.org.uk
Sun Sep 30 00:56:43 EST 2012
The New Aesthetic was extensively discussed on Netbehaviour some months ago. The primary critiques of it seemed to be 1. it isn't new and has been concocted in ignorance of both practical and theoretical work that has been underway for over three decades and 2. with its focus on aesthetics it disables more nuanced approaches to social assemblage and the role of creative practice within that. GH suggested that Post-Modern approaches to these subjects are boring and old hat. I couldn't disagree more (I generally agree with GH). PM seeks to work against the kind of reductivism NA represents. Huge intellectual and attitudinal strides have been made using the tools it provides. NA seeks to negate that. The only benefit I can see in NA is that it reminds us of what is valuable in what might be too familiar.
On 29 Sep 2012, at 13:47, Rob Myers wrote:
> On 09/28/2012 03:22 PM, Jon Lebkowsky wrote:
>> I think NA so far is more acknowledgement than movement, more
>> curation than active construction. What would it take to transform NA from
>> passive to active force? Or does it make more sense to look for activist
>> forces to emerge?
> TNA is managerial capital's digital bleedthrough into the everyday. Things finding their own use for the street. It's something that you experience rather than do. It's something to ironise [further] rather than embrace directly IMO.
> TNA is a quantitative shift big enough to represent a qualitative shift. We weren't doing this in the gallery and in the faculty twenty years ago because it wasn't the pervasive aesthetic epiphenomena of logistics technology.
> With regards to "cool", the TNA tumblr can be certainly be seen as design fiction cool hunting (Bigend would love it). But the history of the creation and instrumentalization of cool (pace Liu) sits productively uncomfortably with this particular distillation of cool.
> The question that TNA cries out is "why does the world look like this"? The answers are obvious, but the devil is in how we cross-reference the details.
> - Rob.
> empyre forum
> empyre at lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au
simon at littlepig.org.uk http://www.littlepig.org.uk/ @SimonBiggsUK skype: simonbiggsuk
s.biggs at ed.ac.uk Edinburgh College of Art, University of Edinburgh
http://www.eca.ac.uk/circle/ http://www.elmcip.net/ http://www.movingtargets.org.uk/
MSc by Research in Interdisciplinary Creative Practices
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the empyre