<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra">What I've found helpful in Leibniz, in view of articulating an aesthetics<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
of digitality in my book, "Digital Baroque: New Media Art and Cinematic<br>
Folds," is Leibniz's notion of "incompossibility," not so much as a<br>
condition of solipsism but as a construct of an intersubjective condition<br>
that remains outside of the framework of what was later to be theorized as<br>
dialectics. </blockquote><div><br></div><div>We can then, maybe, distinguish; <br></div><div>a - solipsism mediated via Central Monade, as defined in Liebnitz; as inter-mediated subjects <br></div><div>b - intersubjectivity (as direct non-mediated) process<br></div><div><br></div><div>So we can pose a question if there is an inter-subjectivity which is mediated and how this transfer (mediation) is made possible (what are its gains and loses? is there any loss in translation?)<br></div> <br></div></div></div>