<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">Here is the second post. Post #2 Data enunciation and Other subjectivities<div>Johanna<br><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:DocumentProperties>
<o:Template>Normal.dotm</o:Template>
<o:Revision>0</o:Revision>
<o:TotalTime>0</o:TotalTime>
<o:Pages>1</o:Pages>
<o:Words>480</o:Words>
<o:Characters>2741</o:Characters>
<o:Company>UCLA</o:Company>
<o:Lines>22</o:Lines>
<o:Paragraphs>5</o:Paragraphs>
<o:CharactersWithSpaces>3366</o:CharactersWithSpaces>
<o:Version>12.0</o:Version>
</o:DocumentProperties>
<o:OfficeDocumentSettings>
<o:AllowPNG/>
</o:OfficeDocumentSettings>
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<w:WordDocument>
<w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom>
<w:TrackMoves>false</w:TrackMoves>
<w:TrackFormatting/>
<w:PunctuationKerning/>
<w:DrawingGridHorizontalSpacing>18 pt</w:DrawingGridHorizontalSpacing>
<w:DrawingGridVerticalSpacing>18 pt</w:DrawingGridVerticalSpacing>
<w:DisplayHorizontalDrawingGridEvery>0</w:DisplayHorizontalDrawingGridEvery>
<w:DisplayVerticalDrawingGridEvery>0</w:DisplayVerticalDrawingGridEvery>
<w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/>
<w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>
<w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent>
<w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>
<w:Compatibility>
<w:BreakWrappedTables/>
<w:DontGrowAutofit/>
<w:DontAutofitConstrainedTables/>
<w:DontVertAlignInTxbx/>
</w:Compatibility>
</w:WordDocument>
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" LatentStyleCount="276">
</w:LatentStyles>
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 10]>
<style>
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
        {mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
        mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
        mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
        mso-style-noshow:yes;
        mso-style-parent:"";
        mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
        mso-para-margin:0in;
        mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Times New Roman";
        mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria;
        mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
        mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";
        mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;
        mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;
        mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;}
</style>
<![endif]--><!--StartFragment--><p class="MsoPlainText">Who <span style="font-family:"Menlo Regular";mso-bidi-font-family:
"Menlo Regular"">“</span>speaks<span style="font-family:"Menlo Regular";
mso-bidi-font-family:"Menlo Regular"">”</span> a data visualization? And who is
“spoken” by it? The syntax of those questions is meant to trip the reader for a
moment, remind us of the linguistic analysis of enunciation. Any utterance, in
any circumstance, is a speech act, embedded in an action between speakers that
positions them in relation to each other. A speaking subject and a spoken
subject are inscribed in language acts. Theories of enunciation are tracked
back to Ferdinand de Saussure (where they are implicit), Mikhail Bakhtin,
Russian Formalism in its linguistic and narratological analyses, and come
forward through the work of Emile Benveniste (where the enunciating and
enunciated subject are clearly defined). Taken up across a wide range of
theoretical discourses, theories of enunciation are intimately linked to
considerations of subject formation—the constitution of the “I” as “self” in
contrast to an “other” providing an illusion of wholeness. Constructions of the
“other” are an integral feature of power relations across cultural, gender,
class, ethnic, and species differences. The analysis of enunciative systems
became an integral part of film studies, and feminist film studies, in work by
Kaja Silverman, Laura Mulvey, the <i style="mso-bidi-font-style:normal">Camera
Obscura</i> editors and authors, figures in <i style="mso-bidi-font-style:normal">Screen</i>,
and other publications of the 1970s and 1980s in which aesthetic artifacts
(visual, literary, cinematic, theatrical, anthropological, institutional etc.)
were subject to critical analysis as power systems, not just representational
expressions. The reading list in this area is long, the body of literature rich
and replete, the participants distinguished and still current, touching on
nearly every aspect of structuralist, post-structuralist, deconstructivist
theory across feminist (and non-feminist) practices. Theories of enunciation
and subject formation are at the heart of queer theory, post-colonial theory,
ecological and species theory—all of which are attuned to the ways symbolic
systems embed, express, and enact power relations through acts of “othering” in
enunciation. </p><p class="MsoPlainText">But
where is the critical analysis of data and its visualization as an enunciative
system? How can we understand the power relations of the “speech acts” of a
graphical expression that positions its “speaker” as neutral, omnipotent, its
mode as declarative, and its flat surface presentation as a statement without
apparent authorship. Data presentations express themselves as if they were
outside of an enunciative system. We know this is not only <i style="mso-bidi-font-style:
normal">not</i> the case, but that the more an expression passes itself off as
natural, the more clearly it is cultural—hegemonic, ideological, and
rhetorically positioned to conceal the power relations it enacts. </p><div>I wonder what others think about the connections between theories of enunciation and graphical expressions of data, knowledge, and information?</div><p class="MsoPlainText">(See Maurizio Lazzarato, “Mikhail Bahktin’s Theory of
Utterance,” <a href="http://www.generation-online.org/p/fp_lazzarato6.htm">http://www.generation-online.org/p/fp_lazzarato6.htm</a>
and John Phillips, “Who is the Subject of Enunciation?” <a href="https://courses.nus.edu.sg/course/elljwp/enunciation.htm">https://courses.nus.edu.sg/course/elljwp/enunciation.htm</a>
for two recent start points; for those interested in fundamentals, Kaja
Silverman, <i style="mso-bidi-font-style:normal">The Subject of Semiotics</i>,
1983, Rosalind Coward and John Ellis, <i style="mso-bidi-font-style:normal">Language
and Materialism, </i>1977)</p>
<!--EndFragment--></div></body></html>