<div dir="ltr"><div><div>OMG, Alex,</div><div><br></div><div>Your post sent a chill up my spine.</div><div><br></div><div>Yes, yes, you know that my pedagogy and critical/art practice is heavily inspired by your own. And I love #100hardtruths! I had not scene it. What a beautiful and challenging creation on a platform (scalar) on which you have been a principal pioneer! I'm going to add it to the Reading List for the course.</div><div><br></div><div>I've got a few reactions to comments you made. (not in any particular order)</div><div><br></div><div> inevitable macho weaponization built upon the cascade of all of our little internet truths </div><div><br></div><div>(This isn't nec. where you were headed, but triggered a reflection on gendered behavior._</div><div>I think there is something masculinist in my response to these matters, as the tradition of satire draws upon a certain break in communication empathy that is historically been associated with cis males. Not trying to get essentialist here, just thinking through why it seems that men in particular seem to gravitate toward the satirical response.</div><div><br></div><div>I highlight the satirical (in response to your comment on humor) because it was ONLY in the realm of the satirical that I felt truly safe to discuss Fake News. I had the pleasure of chatting with Edgar Arceneaux about his Museum of Black Lies at the Main (beta) and some people came up afterwards to ask questions. Soon I found myself being asked to offer a positive straight version of media literacy in the face of Fake News -- one teachers could use in schools. At every turn, I found myself, like the Fake Newser-in-Chief, having to backpedal, apologize, redefine, retract, clarify.</div><div><br></div><div>Satire, in this project, allowed Talan and me (although I can't speak for him without access to his Twitter account) to thread the needle through criticism and witticisms, being the drunken gadflies that we are rather than becoming the pedant. Such satirical cooking contribute to the soup of nonsense from which flat fake news emerges, but I think it does more than that -- because it demands that the reader recognize the play of discourse at every turn -- and stop asking for people to just start speaking true again (as if this was ever the case).</div><div><br></div><div>More importantly, in this moment, I think we need to be nimble. And satire gives us a nimbleness, if not overly drawn into cynicism. It's not the only response (please, keep marching, everyone!). But in discourse on Fake News it is a very capable response which, as I hope these projects and courses prove, can be critically constructive. Of course, it won't be to everyone's taste.</div><div><br></div><div>And... to take up your larger point. We may need to go offline. Or need to be planning/conspiring/communing/coalescing offline as well. </div><div><br></div><div>Rob Wittig and I have meditated quite a bit on the money our art makes for the Internet giants (c.f., I work for the Web <a href="http://robwit.net/iwfw/">http://robwit.net/iwfw/</a>), if we can talk through projects, which I think we must!).</div><div><br></div><div>I look forward to the continuing conversation on AND offline!</div><div><br></div><div>- Mark</div><div><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra">
</div></div>