<div dir="ltr">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Arial;background-image:initial;background-size:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial;background-position:initial;background-repeat:initial">Love these images,
Renate. They exemplify virality as picked up in new media criticism. </span><span style="font-family:Arial">As we know, in those studies, the virus is fêted
for its ability to contaminate—to replicate through</span><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial"> </span><span style="font-family:Arial">informatic cutting, pasting, and multiplying (the
meme). Its simple microprocessuality (the homegrown machine); its bottom-up
hydra-headed acentered organization (the swarm or brood); and its ability to
set in motion a series of sudden and unpredictable effects (contagion) are all
celebrated as machinic possibilities. Jussi Parikka’s early <i>Digital
Contagions </i>(2007) references HIV as a cultural figure for
understanding the behaviors of computer bugs, worms, and viruses; in fact, in
the 1980s, informatic contagion would be known as “computer AIDS.” Tony
Sampson’s <i>Virality</i> (2012) extends the model of network
contagion to rethink micro socialities and the capacity for social
transformation through such contagious networks. Both Parikka and Sampson see
contagion not as a fearsome force but an open-ended system that enables a jump
cut to something qualitatively new. Some call it an emergence.</span><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial"><span></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Arial"> <span></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Arial">Your students’ proliferating images—so gorgeous!—resonate with this
understanding of mediatic virality. The contamination jumps to the new, something
creative and qualitatively different, a series of micro-actions generating a
network.<span></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Arial"> <span></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Arial">Of course, it is now commonplace to think biological and machinic
together in some strains of new media criticism. I find Tiziana
Terranova’s <i>Network Culture</i> (2004) most persuasive: thinking
of virality, she theorizes the actions of “relatively simple machines” as the
bases of radical transformation, social and political. Emphasizing the
informatic turn in the biological sciences, Terranova argues infinite zeroes
and ones better simulate the “sudden discontinuous variations” in microscopic
states. In this view, organisms are not complex machines but aggregates of
large populations of simple machines whose variable actions are calculable.
Therefore new media (as in disease surveillance networks) are most capable of
predicting where and how the next radical disturbance, the new event will
emerge.<span></span></span></p>
</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 9:27 PM, Renate Terese Ferro <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rferro@cornell.edu" target="_blank">rferro@cornell.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">----------empyre- soft-skinned space----------------------<br>Dear Bishnu and Tim,<br>
<br>
Thanks Bishnu so much for writing about the research for this new book. It sounds fascinating in light of the panicked contangion that permeates the news so frequently. I find the visual documentation related to these accounts fascinating for examble a few years ago, the photographs of the doctors and nursers in fully sealed protective suits caring for Ebola patients and the videos of their boides being hosed down after a work day provided us with visual documentation but also an imagined understanding of the Ebola virus but also the cultural, racial, and political complications that became so entwined with that epidemic. Looking forward to hearing more about your research on media and virsuses.<br>
<br>
Thanks Tim for the link to C-Theory Digital Terror and also reminding us of how contemporary networks of contamination can fluidly slip across borders via politics, language, images, and media My intention in introducing this topic was to encourage cross-disciplinary ways that contamination manifests itself in contemporary global environments and this week’s news of North and South Korea is a great example.<br>
<br>
Earlier this semster my students in Introduction to Digital Media brainstormed a list of media—books, tv, movies—inspried by a prompt I posed to them. What happens when bio-networks go awry? We looked at ways that artists, writers, filmmakers simulate contagion and other models of contamination. With the creative research as inspiration the students wrote creative narratives. After writing they were asked to collect an assemblage of found natural objects from nature and with high definition scanning they composited visual models. Using magnification, repetition, overlap, inverting color and other visual strategies they imapped the microsopic contamination of their narratives. We took multiple projectors and projected their simulated models on bodies and surfaces interjecting them back into the environment as a final intervention. The simplified prompt I gave to these 1st year art students prompted engaging discussions about health and safety, politics, the environment, language, truth, and more not to mention to resulting creative visual interventions.<br>
<br>
I have attached a couple of images here. Hoping you will share more about your ideas of media, viruses, and panic this week.<br>
Welcome back Christina McPHee who should be joining us tomorrow.<br>
<br>
Renate<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
----------empyre- soft-skinned space----------------------<br>
Hi Renate, Christina, Tim, and others in the contamination conversation,<br>
<br>
Last week brought up some really key ideas around contamination and<br>
boundaries that it assumes between organic units or states. My research is<br>
on epidemic media, specifically focuses on how humans have learned to “live<br>
with” pathogenic viruses. I am writing a book titled “The Virus Touch:<br>
Theorizing Epidemic Media,” which essentially looks at the role of media in<br>
living with viruses: that is, how do media modify biological processes so<br>
as to “intervene,” as Anna Tsing puts it, in planetary damage. I’m excited<br>
Tsing’s and Haraway’s pathbreaking works are already in the discussion—they<br>
are central to the project.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
After all, the Human Microbiome Project confirms microbial cells weighing<br>
as little as 200 grams outnumber human cells 10 to 1. The “new biology,”<br>
argues Rodney Dietert (*The Human Superorganism: How the Microbiome is<br>
Revolutionizing the Pursuit of Healthy Life*, 2016), suggests humans are<br>
multispecies “super-organisms” and not a single species at all. And yet,<br>
there is cause for alarm when a new species relation endangers one species<br>
at individual and populational scale. This is what happens when new viruses<br>
skip into new populations. At that point, we think about contamination as<br>
contagion. When the imminent takeover of one species by another--virus<br>
proliferation killing off hosts--is at hand, technological interventions<br>
materialize a series of mediatic interfaces. For example, living as<br>
undetectable with HIV is one such interface realized as numeric threshold.<br>
Such interfaces separate microbial and human life; they are not<br>
ontological barriers but a series of effects (as media theorist, Alex<br>
Galloway calls them) contrused to regulate the existing or the potential<br>
coexistence of different species. Because these interfaces build livable<br>
microbial-human futures; because they enable multispecies accommodations, I<br>
think of them as *environmental media*.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Yet every time I say I’m writing a book on epidemic media, folks think I’m<br>
writing about contagion as purely negative—you know, the contagion media<br>
that enthrone human heroism against pathogenic hordes. There is excellent<br>
scholarship on contagion fiction and non-fiction, movies and television<br>
shows, video games and comic books. Fed a steady diet of realistic<br>
fictional outbreak narratives and apocalyptic futures, we have become<br>
comfortably numb to the horror of coming plagues: to the symptomatic Ebola<br>
infection-like hemorrhage, to the inevitable segregation of the sick and<br>
the well, to the tales of military heroism and scientific triumph. Ebola<br>
plays the phantom microbe in these contagion media; it is the iconic<br>
instance of the resurgent bugs that scientist Joshua Lederberg once<br>
christened “the deadliest threat to mankind.” We have grown accustomed to<br>
its sudden emergences and drug-resistant mutations after the outbreaks of<br>
Marburg, Ebola, and HIV in the early 1980s. The introduction of a new<br>
course in infectious diseases at the Center for Disease Control in 1985,<br>
argues Melinda Cooper, serves as one marker for crossing the historical<br>
threshold into the age of “viral storms. In popular discourse, Laurie<br>
Garrett’s non-fictional *The Coming Plague: Newly Emerging Diseases in a<br>
World Out of Balance* (1994) was the tipping point for public panic. Since<br>
then “living with” such deadly pathogens, living in anticipation of the<br>
next outbreak has become historical necessity.<br>
<br>
<br>
That panic is now folded into the productive agendas of living as<br>
multispecies. Here, Anna Tsing is a key thinker, urging us to intervene in<br>
the “blasted ruins of the Anthropocene” (*The Mushroom at the End of the<br>
World*, 2017). The idea is not to return to a mythic natural contract, but<br>
to live among the ruins, to act among the ruins, to tend the garden. For<br>
Tsing, even “the most promising oasis of natural plenty requires massive<br>
intervention” (85). The real question is which natural and social<br>
disturbances can we live with? Which ones command our attention?<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
This is the ecological angle—I thought it has a good resonance with last<br>
week’s concerns on residual contamination. I’ll post later on how<br>
contamination re virality has been taken up in media studies.<br>
<br>
<br>
cheers,<br>
<br>
Bishnu<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Renate Ferro<br>
Visiting Associate Professor<br>
Director of Undergraduate Studies<br>
Department of Art<br>
Tjaden Hall 306<br>
<a href="mailto:rferro@cornell.edu">rferro@cornell.edu</a><br>
<br>
On 11/13/17, 2:41 PM, "<a href="mailto:empyre-bounces@lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au">empyre-bounces@lists.<wbr>artdesign.unsw.edu.au</a> on behalf of Bishnupriya Ghosh" <<a href="mailto:empyre-bounces@lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au">empyre-bounces@lists.<wbr>artdesign.unsw.edu.au</a> on behalf of <a href="mailto:bghosh@english.ucsb.edu">bghosh@english.ucsb.edu</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
----------empyre- soft-skinned space----------------------<br>
<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
empyre forum<br>
<a href="mailto:empyre@lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au">empyre@lists.artdesign.unsw.<wbr>edu.au</a><br>
<a href="http://empyre.library.cornell.edu" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://empyre.library.cornell.<wbr>edu</a><br>
<br>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
empyre forum<br>
<a href="mailto:empyre@lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au">empyre@lists.artdesign.unsw.<wbr>edu.au</a><br>
<a href="http://empyre.library.cornell.edu" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://empyre.library.cornell.<wbr>edu</a><br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div>Professor Bishnupriya Ghosh</div><div><span style="font-size:12.8px">Department of English and Global Studies</span></div><div><span style="font-size:12.8px">3431 South Hall</span></div><div dir="ltr"><div>UC Santa Barbara</div><div>Santa Barbara, CA 93106-3170</div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>
</div>