<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p><br>
</p>
<div class="moz-forward-container"> On 6/11/18 9:11 AM, Kate
Brettkelly wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAMmfP2qEqV_REc6HThF_WeG5uk_ZD+2SJhHCrvA5r8m_=K=V8A@mail.gmail.com">looking
more critically at this artistic interest in deep time, I have
wondered whether it risks the presumption of an absolute,
universal frame of reference. Does it presuppose a primordial
time that is rather conveniently indifferent to histories of
social inequality and subjugation? More pointedly, when we
celebrate the deep time of earth, do we actively overlook the
durations and experiences of indigenous peoples? </blockquote>
<p>Dear <<empyreans>>, Kate,</p>
<p>This was so apropos, in being able to make the answer <i>yes</i>,
that I would like to add it here, perhaps adding more questions,
than any affirmation, since it is from a work in progress:</p>
<p> </p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0cm; font-style: normal; line-height:
150%"><font face="DejaVu Serif, serif">...we have abolished
space and time, but there is always time in the scene and
space for the action. Simply put, these are not elements of
the outside. We have abolished certainty, but the advance in
this regard is in the recognition of symbolism, the
impressionism of a phenomenology, the mannerisms of
existentialism and the genesis of representation.</font></p>
<p>
<style type="text/css">p { margin-bottom: 0.25cm; line-height: 120%; }</style></p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>Simon Taylor</p>
<p><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://squarewhiteworld.com" moz-do-not-send="true">http://squarewhiteworld.com</a><br>
</p>
<p>
<style type="text/css">p { margin-bottom: 0.25cm; line-height: 120%; }</style></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>