[-empyre-] Re: copyright



"New media" or not, artists "traditionally" have been
robbed-blind by art institutions -- it may be more pertinent
to first insure that artists/heirs are compensated for the
increased monetary value of exhibited/collected works. 
Copyright laws would seem to have minimal monetary affect in
this regard, and would likely curtail any contemporary
distribution methods that run-around restrictive,
hierarchical, regressive institutional structures still
standing. 



The 12hr-ISBN-JPEG Project                >>>> since 1994 <<<<

+ + +         serial           ftp://ftp.eskimo.com/u/b/bbrace
+ + +      eccentric          ftp://ftp.idiom.com/users/bbrace
+ + +     continuous         hotline://artlyin.ftr.va.com.au
+ + +    hypermodern      ftp://ftp.rdrop.com/pub/users/bbrace
+ + +        imagery   ftp://ftp.pacifier.com/pub/users/bbrace

News:  alt.binaries.pictures.12hr   alt.binaries.pictures.misc
               alt.binaries.pictures.fine-art.misc    alt.12hr
           
12hr email
subscriptions => http://bbrace.laughingsquid.net/buy-into.html 

   Other  |  Mirror: http://www.eskimo.com/~bbrace/bbrace.html
Projects  |  Reverse Solidus: http://bbrace.laughingsquid.net/


{ brad brace }   <<<<< bbrace@eskimo.com >>>>  ~finger for pgp




















This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and MHonArc 2.6.8.