Re: [-empyre-] Is it digital art?

["app][lick.ation][end.age" <netwurker@hotkey.net.au>]

At 12:50 PM 8/7/2002 +1200, sean wrote:

> there is no private space. Privacy was the privilee of a small european/US 
> elite for a brief period between about 1800 and 1950. Today only 
> wife-beaters and tax-evaders protect their privacy. The web is a place for 
> the interface between the pblic and the intimate. Of course.

how.D sean + other m.pyreans,

  i've been wanting 2 wade in2 various m.pyrean threads 4 a while now, but 
have either been otherwise occupied or living in fear of treading on 
various mailing list toes & having my subscription][s][ re][ar][voked ;).....

......the notion of privacy & the net is 2 good 2 let slide in2 the 
archival m(l)ist, howeva......i understand yr notion regarding the web|net 
acting as a portal in relation 2 the distinction regarding public|private, 
& am n.terested specifically in the idea of email clients & how they 
further perpetuate the myth of individualized ][data][ ownership......of 
course, the issue of how Integer [NN, Antiorp, etc] blurrs these pre-set 
boundaries is n.teresting, as is the idea of act of 
cross-po][llination][sting & the n.herent shadow network this 
m.plies...........

any thoughts on this sean [or any1, really] b4 i release the netwurker idea 
hounds?;)

pub.lick.ally,
mez




.           .    ....         .....
collapsing adj[thr]usting.txt
.
.
app][lick.ation][end.age

www.cddc.vt.edu/host/netwurker/
http://www.macros-center.ru/read_me/inexen.htm#re
.... .               .???  .......