Re: [-empyre-] time again

[Damien Everett <e40815@rmit.edu.au>]

melinda rackham wrote:
> Its  merely a different rhythm of time/space that we get used to
> on the net, when information space is 2dimensional....  flat ,  or 
> shallow
> as olliver dyens was talking about when he was a guest earlier this 
> year,
hmmm, it may appear 2 dimensional on screen, tho in my mind it is n 
dimensional,  information/data is All, the number of possible 
connections of brain neurons appears to be the same as the number of 
atoms in our universe...  other dimensions are there if we know how to 
perceive them... interactive intelligence is a favourate of mine ;)

>maybe ive been around computers for too long  but  i 've come to belive 
in
>finity, in limits, to an end of possibility, to everything being a
>mathematical probaility.

well maybe, but just wait for the next upgrade! every 
system/medium/thought has inherent constraints, tho there can be a lot 
of freedom + play  within constraints, probability is the fuzzy 
weighting of possibility, extend the system to extend the scope of the 
realisable.

>> ...mel, r u referring 2 the idea here that space is s.sentially
>> collapsible|inconstant & how this relates 2  the idea that
>> virtuality|networked arenas r conceptualised as unique, rather than
>> contextualised as fundamentally trajectoric?
>
>yep.. new, fresh, different, when its really all the same stuff  -the 
same
>old space repackaged/packetted.

or distilled to the essence, a unique synthesis presented in a new 
light, a new branch on the tree of knowledge providing inspired insight, 
the evolutionary reincarnation of wisdom from ages past... I do believe 
true intent and progression are important here... liberate us from 
misconceptions about the Real (or anything else that "matters").

love and best wishes,
damien