[-empyre-] Returning to bidimensionality & the body
Dear Barbara
Concerning ideas of a ?Modern Project' here which supposedly might "remake
the world as it 'should be"? Who knows what it should be? {^_~} No, I?m more
interested in unaccustomed post-post-modern conditions (those which I see as
viractual) where cultural workers develop particulars which are not quite
historically conditioned yet. The function a prosthetic viractual
techno-art, for me, is to create new deviant ? although erudite -
technological-aesthetic percepts. The goal is a society which might better
focus on an interfaces between the virtual and the actual (the viractual)
which includes the energy of nature.
So yes, I think that we can develop to know ourselves as bidimensional, as
you suggest. I am trying to embody this idea in my art this way: I very much
like to work with the digital in its predominant visual form, the immaterial
abstract information of pixels and I like very much the world wide
transportable dimension of the Internet, where the digital data-stream
travels at the speed of light - but I also like to see a large-scaled
semblance just sitting still on an unchanging canvas so I can silently
reflect on it and move within the work in natural light at my leisure with
customary unrestrictions to my bodily movements.
My work's extensive ornate excess attempts to give to society an expansive
metaphor for the viractual / bidimensional condition - our current state of
digital-assisted being. In the rising and collapsing of alternative
visualizations and unordered revelations seen in the work, the circuits of
the mind, I hope, may find a dexterity exactly congruence with the formation
of the viractual.
Joseph Nechvatal
http://www.nechvatal.net
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.