[-empyre-] Returning to bidimensionality & the body





Dear Barbara

Concerning ideas of a ?Modern Project' here which supposedly might "remake the world as it 'should be"? Who knows what it should be? {^_~} No, I?m more interested in unaccustomed post-post-modern conditions (those which I see as viractual) where cultural workers develop particulars which are not quite historically conditioned yet. The function a prosthetic viractual techno-art, for me, is to create new deviant ? although erudite - technological-aesthetic percepts. The goal is a society which might better focus on an interfaces between the virtual and the actual (the viractual) which includes the energy of nature.

So yes, I think that we can develop to know ourselves as bidimensional, as you suggest. I am trying to embody this idea in my art this way: I very much like to work with the digital in its predominant visual form, the immaterial abstract information of pixels and I like very much the world wide transportable dimension of the Internet, where the digital data-stream travels at the speed of light - but I also like to see a large-scaled semblance just sitting still on an unchanging canvas so I can silently reflect on it and move within the work in natural light at my leisure with customary unrestrictions to my bodily movements.

My work's extensive ornate excess attempts to give to society an expansive metaphor for the viractual / bidimensional condition - our current state of digital-assisted being. In the rising and collapsing of alternative visualizations and unordered revelations seen in the work, the circuits of the mind, I hope, may find a dexterity exactly congruence with the formation of the viractual.


Joseph Nechvatal http://www.nechvatal.net



~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*



_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com





This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and MHonArc 2.6.8.