[-empyre-] vogs - control
- To: empyre@imap.cofa.unsw.edu.au
- Subject: [-empyre-] vogs - control
- From: "Nemo Nox" <lists@nemonox.com>
- Date: Mon Jul 1 15:07:01 2002
- Delivered-to: empyre@imap.cofa.unsw.edu.au
- In-reply-to: <p05111721b9416e7a4bdf@[131.170.98.157]>
- References: <p05111717b93491f09d5c@[131.170.98.157]> <200206181333080500.02A8CC9D@mail.nemonox.com> <p05111707b93568577594@[131.170.98.157]> <200206201935110970.0098EBAC@mail.nemonox.com> <p05111726b938494d586a@[131.170.98.157]> <200206271546510570.001246C6@mail.nemonox.com> <p05111721b9416e7a4bdf@[131.170.98.157]>
- Reply-to: empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au
- Sender: empyre-admin@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au
Adrian Miles wrote:
>getouttahere :-) when does control begin and end then?
>what an audience does with it? interpretation? and who
>wants to be an author why not just be a facilitator?
>who wrote the i ching and does that really matter much
>given that it's the system of combination that is
>important there? it's not about authorship
When authorship starts to get blurred by random
interventions (and anything outside the author's
control is somehow random) I always remember the
Elephant Art Gallery (www.soarts.com/elephantart).
Is that on the same level as a Pollock? :-)
Nemo Nox
http://www.ploft.com/index.shtml
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.