[-empyre-] Re:replying to several posts

["chfalci" <chfalci@uol.com.br>]

" sounds interesting, but where is the auditor / reader in
relation to the
text/machine (Aarseth), possibly implicit in your reference
to 'writing
potentialities'. . .I think one must take care not to
objectivize the text
external to its interpretation too greatly; one needs a
reader-response
theory for the machine"


About this, I agree with above affirmative, and I wanna
suggest this theory perpasses the concept of immersion,
anyway. And to me, computer is a symbolic machine only if can
stimulate a semiosis. It don't need a human to begins, but
the symbols don't exist for themselves, don't them?

Carlos




---
UOL, o melhor da Internet
http://www.uol.com.br/