RE: [-empyre-] fwd from Andrew Murpie re fundamental.

To: "soft_skinned_space" <empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au>
Subject: RE: [-empyre-] fwd from Andrew Murpie re fundamental.
From: "Jim Andrews" <jim@vispo.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 21:58:38 -0800
Delivered-to: empyre@bebop.cofa.unsw.edu.au
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <00e501c3a5ac$5ea27950$171b083d@fluffy>
Reply-to: soft_skinned_space <empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au>

Thanks, Andrew. I will check out Brooks and Varela.

It would be fascinating to hear an alternative clearly stated. I will look
for that in Rodney Brooks and Francisco Varela.

OK, I've had enough of this debate with Alan. It would be nice to hear from
other people.

ja

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [-empyre-] fwd from Andrew Murpie re fundamental.
  - From: "Deborah MacPherson" <dmacp.mail@verizon.net>

References:
- [-empyre-] fwd from Andrew Murpie re fundamental.
  - From: "-empyre-owner" <empyre-owner@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au>

Previous by Date: Re: [-empyre-] re more fundamental -fwd from Andrew Murpie .
Next by Date: RE: [-empyre-] re more fundamental -fwd from Andrew Murpie .
Previous by Thread: [-empyre-] fwd from Andrew Murpie re fundamental.
Next by Thread: RE: [-empyre-] fwd from Andrew Murpie re fundamental.
empyre November 2003 archives indexes sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
empyre list archive Table of Contents
More information about the empyre mailing list

This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and MHonArc 2.6.8.