alo,
hey
I believe there is generally a growing interest in open source
software
and people do not any longer mind the trouble of going through the
installation procedures.
Maybe it is both sides opening up. The developers trying to include a
larger non-specialist community by providing installers and packaging.
The public by accepting that getting software which is under constant
development, available for (almost) free and for all platform means a
bit of action.
It's probably the beginning of a real shift from a passive consumerist
attitude towards active involvement. Which brings me straight streaming
and the Free Radio Linux project.
hmmm...i would instead say that the technocratic class is enlarging, but
not growing as fast as the group of computer users that haven't ever used
a piece of 'open source' software on their local machine....
However I think what makes this project really fascinating is the interest in listening to the open source code which most listeners weren't able to decipher. It's there and it´s open to see for everyone, even more, it is being broadcasted - and we are not understanding a single line of it (that's were the humor lies for me).
actually, in the terminology you use is part of te point of Free Radio linux...the code was 'audiolised' not 'visualised' - users could 'hear' the code not 'see' it...but this was a minor point, hopefully to be examnied more closely in some projects we are working on now
are you able and willing to tell us more ;) just getting very curious......
Still, if your were reading the
ascii-gibberish of compiled windows source I guess nobody would bother
to listen to. It rather be a humiliating experience, being laughed upon.
well, i would say the two experiences are almost exactly the same!! :) the
point is, that listening to the code does somehow make it more accessible
to some - maybe because its the first tiem they have been confronted with
code...but actually, the experience would be teh same in some sense to
these kinds of peopel as listening to a binary file being spoken - they
dont really understand it, nor can they do anything with it- thats the
critique of open source that we offer - even if you ahve it -what will you
do with it? ...really?
how many can have actually seen C+ scripts? how many of 'us' can alter code? how many of 'us' could alter someones elses code? what kind of freedom is this then? it certainly isnt "free as in speech"...infact it seems a lot closer to an offer of a "free beer" to someone that doesnt drink to me....or perhaps worse, maybe its an offer of some hops and sugar... ;-)
I would go as far as to say that we have got something very close to a
religon going on with open source...there are two churchs...Open Source
and Free Software, they both preach pretty much the same thing except one
is abit more liberal that the other, one evangelizes more than the other
('bring those bad propriety guys into our ways'), but basically they are
the same...and they HATE each other!!!!
I am still thinking about that religious aspect...will get back to this later
yours with tongue firmly in cheek
i got a little tooth-ache but i am sticking to it :)
felix