From: "Alexie Glass" <aglass@acmi.net.au>
Reply-To: soft_skinned_space <empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au>
To: <empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au>
Subject: [-empyre-] in-situ
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 09:24:50 +1000
Hi its Alexie, sorry the intro is a day late... here's something to kick
off this weeks forum
Location, Location, Location. These three words could represent a manifesto
for the 21st century. Abducted from the spruikers of lifestyle TV and real
estate agents, and co-opted into the vernacular of contemporary visual
practice, the paradoxical lure, absurdity, and emphatic demands of the
phrase don't diminish. In fact, this earnest catch-cry exposes questions
about the binary relationship of information de-centralisation to the
reality of global urbanisation. Does place matter? Some might say location
in contemporary art is currency, because the right location can ensure
access to audiences - that's cultural capital. And history documents a set
of responses to this condition. Land art in the 1960's was a snub to the
centre, a refute to capital. Installation art and site specific practice in
the 1980's and 90's was often implemented as an action to subvert and
expose while still engaging the paradigmatics of certain spaces: think
museums, galleries, and, in the case of much public art, urban spaces. Over
the past decade the colonisation of online space is yet another departure
from the vagaries of the flaneur who simply strolls, tantalised by taste,
experiencing the multiplicity of the arts as a visual buffet. In-situ
suggests a greater interactivity, whether that equates to pressing buttons
or a cognitive awareness for the viewer of their experience of destabilised
space. New media and process-based collaborations articulate another view
again. So, for artists, perhaps the question is what - if any - are the
aesthetic, political and contextual concerns that situated practice is
evoking?
**********************************************************************
This communication contains information which is confidential and the
copyright of the Australian Centre for the Moving Image.
If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail please notify the
sender immediately and delete it from your system.
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and
may not be the views of the Australian Centre for the Moving Image, unless
specifically stated.
**********************************************************************
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
**********************************************************************
_______________________________________________
empyre forum
empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au
http://www.subtle.net/empyre