Re: [-empyre-] Neoconcrete

[saul ostrow <sostrow@gate.cia.edu>]

There was a that time a number of possible positions that a critic would
take be they left, existential formal - populist, traditionalist,  etc.
also did these critics look to Europe  or to the US -- and if they did
neither what was their orientation --  I'm  trying to figure out what
the critical discourse was  -- here in the north there is little
available as to the nature of the critical debates that were taking
place in the south in the 50s and 60s -- 

arteonline wrote:
> 
> Hi Saul,
> 
> Thanks for your interest. I think that the most important critics and
> theorists in Brazil
> during the 50s and 60s were Mario Pedrosa,  Mario Schenberg, Ferreira Gullar
> and Frederico Moraes later 60s). Perhaps Jorge can remember other names.
> 
> What do you mean with "how did they align themselves" ? I did not understand
> very well.
> 
> Regina
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "saul ostrow" <sostrow@gate.cia.edu>
> To: <arteonline@arteonline.arq.br>; <empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au>
> Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2004 7:25 PM
> Subject: Re: [-empyre-] Neoconcrete
> 
> >
> > Regina -- I read with interest your text about the neoconcrete --
> > Might I ask who where the most important critics and theorist in Brazil
> > during the 50s and 60s and how did they align themselves --
> > Saul Ostrow
> >
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> empyre forum
> empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au
> http://www.subtle.net/empyre