[-empyre-] Calasso - and peculiarity:)))



What is unbearable it is to uitliser the quotation of an author that looks
for the otherness to make it a lead astray against the peculiarity, to set
peculiarity against peculiarity to settle its own accounts. It is indeed why
the register of short quotations is generally a misinforming.

I hope that those who does not know of Calasso will not be held in this lead
astray and will refer to the context.

Here is it to hide a personal faith in the edifying by the reference of
Calasso (that very legally looked at the arts and at the védiques faiths?:)

Then we stigmatize what seems opposite to the author, nevertheless presented
somewhere else among an anarchistic literature.

Here is the result of your translation:
Suddenly I wonder whether our friends Christina and Melinda was not be in
the train of us delivers to the year experiment of the malpractice
interactive between partners almost in real time of the emails : and why
not?






This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and MHonArc 2.6.8.