Re: [-empyre-] we-blog introduction
- To: clemos <cl3mos@gmail.com>, soft_skinned_space <empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au>
- Subject: Re: [-empyre-] we-blog introduction
- From: Chris Ashley <chrisashley@yahoo.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 15:33:31 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc:
- Delivered-to: empyre@gamera.cofa.unsw.edu.au
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=G3QUshjKHkOdM0vXEBv4xoHULLSOW6yuyqd8r8YDYecC2GTnPDC4Ce5uo18meLm6rJUFIqAh6jcJ4g7R2X7JAOc4U+VWNRuUzLaSuevJmJckRj5DxayDl6fqwSjJKRoHc99z0mCepgRF55/AAfagLUHDFjyVt+TDg+LEmRJJHfM= ;
- In-reply-to: <a2ec3f180506060228136a9258@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: soft_skinned_space <empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au>
--- clemos <cl3mos@gmail.com> wrote:
> try to open a .gif with notepad
> it's kind of pleasant too :)
> pretty tough to draw a .gif with notepad, but...
I should try.
> looks like a good old discussion about painting, and
> especially
> minimal painting, or even monochrome painting ...
> in my opinion there's definitely a kind of "hand"
> involved in all this
> (pixel painting in general actually)... only the
> interface is
> different, but the result, regarding the emotion you
> get while doing
> or watching one of these, is the same
I like paintings. I look at paintings a lot. I make
paintings. HTML drawings began as a substitute, but I
don't ultimately think that the materials and
experience of looking at paintings and digital images
don't in the end have a lot of common. For me the two
do share some subject matter, some general pictorial
approaches, but the end result is so different- I'm
happy to have both practices.
> transmitted from the brain to the hand of the
> artist, and then to the
> work) exists.
> maybe you should search this particular 'hand' in
> the html code itself
> (which is actually the real product of the artist,
> the picture being
> only a browser interpretation), which sometimes
> contains unuseful
> (invisible) spaces, and event comments or stuff like
> that.
Funny you mention that. I'd played with that a little
in the past, but just recently, after discussing ideas
with a friend, began putting in, just as a little
beginning, a few invented table attributes (I removed
the opening and closing brackets; is this the kind of
thing you're referring to:
table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0"
bgcolor="#FFFFFF" author="Chris Ashley" title="Asn
Exhaustive List of Possibilities" date="20050601"
size="540 x 784 pixels"
url="http://www.chrisashley.net/weblog/archives/week_2005_06_05.html#000832"
note="Michael Arnold Mages wrote, 'I suppose I didn't
intend to create an exhaustive list of the
potentialities in my introduction, nor suggest that
journalism was the raison d'être for weblogging.' See
http://www.chrisashley.net/weblog/archives/week_2005_05_29.html#000824."
I'm thinking about more comments like this throughout
tables.
Chris
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.