[-empyre-] Fwd: Content filtered message notification
- To: soft_skinned_space <empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au>
- Subject: [-empyre-] Fwd: Content filtered message notification
- From: marcus bastos <bastos.marcus@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 20:29:45 -0300
- Delivered-to: empyre@gamera.cofa.unsw.edu.au
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=bJDfTi7E4GXJ+mVCAd8GnO3KepDDU9w+KiaKXMr7V4baBrf+TBVgXGmSyi2mH64JGLrceD/ZjYJItNThwyEem1ppGQ1sO8qUszLQLxqhgQb+f30n1jejH8M3bzBfY59IAlcIClO9IEYFN6r6XPPI+L8j294rQFUclbxw/LDSvtM=
- In-reply-to: <mailman.323.1128727028.359.empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au>
- References: <mailman.323.1128727028.359.empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au>
- Reply-to: marcus bastos <bastos.marcus@gmail.com>, soft_skinned_space <empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au>
more Bill Seaman
btw, I aks you all to send you post in "plain text", otherwise the
list will filter it!
best
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: mailman-bounces@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au
<mailman-bounces@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au>
Date: Oct 7, 2005 8:17 PM
Subject: Content filtered message notification
To: empyre-owner@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au
The attached message matched the empyre mailing list's content
filtering rules and was prevented from being forwarded on to the list
membership. You are receiving the only remaining copy of the
discarded message.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Bill Seaman <bseaman@risd.edu>
To: empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 19:15:54 -0400
Subject: Re: [-empyre-] Writing and Pattern Flows
It is interesting to look back sometimes... Find first instances. I
have been reading about Topological Psychology - Kurt Lewin... here
were a series of meaning vectors --- force fields that act upon each
other.
Words are wonderfully strong fields as are other media elements.
I am hedging my bets on the most open interpretations of writing ---
even more open than Derrida or Dleeuze and Guattari, although they
have some wonderful concepts (you can download my dissertation as a
pdf from billseaman.com and search some of these...)
I am also interested in Peirce's notion of meaning is that which the
sign conveys --- (or sign configuration) or machinic assemblage that
is time-based - Deleuze and Guattari (1000 Plateaus) --- Yet I think
we are moving into a post-semiotic moment --- code is powerful in
ways that Pierce could only hint at...
>
>On some level, the nature of a given pattern flow, how it updates
>itself, the feel of its evolution, how it alters its methods, can
>become the meaning of the story, a model of experience, even a form
>of cognition.
Awareness of these processes is central to my work. What Varella
calls "mindful awareness" [embodied mind] --- one becomes aware
through intra-action of their own choices, actions, etc. but also
watches themselves make these choices--- better coming to know
themselves. Some works you go into and lose yourself, some works you
become more self aware --- some both.
meta awareness.
>
>That way we should be able to encourage meaning that is emergent due
>to the interplay of fields or modes and their response to
>audiences/readers/players/etc
This is central to my current practice... and to the notion of
constructing "sentient" learning systems and/or systems that augment
intelligence. [see Memex etc.]We are on the cusp of some very
interesting learning machines. How will the output of these
mechanisms [new forms of writing] be folded back into experience?
b
>Wow is right ... what an amazing exchange. I'm sort of a lurker on
>this list, so hello, my background is some digital writing for
>games. While doing that, I soon realized that the idea of pattern
>flows and an awareness of them is critical. In a game, narrative can
>be a traditional pipeline of information or series of events, but
>feels more exciting as an exploration of modes and/or fields of
>persuasion. On some level, the nature of a given pattern flow, how
>it updates itself, the feel of its evolution, how it alters its
>methods, can become the meaning of the story, a model of experience,
>even a form of cognition. For me, the question is how can these
>modes be combined in ways that first, feel responsive thereby
>creating expectation and second, create dynamic meanings? Writing
>can't be separated out from pattern flow acquisition or a
>multi-modal pattern production because in a fundamental sense the
>writing that needs to be done in these narratives is the creation of
>those arrangements or the construction of environments that lead to
>the creation of those arrangements. That way we should be able to
>encourage meaning that is emergent due to the interplay of fields or
>modes and their response to audiences/readers/players/etc . . .
>
>-- Angela
--
Professor Bill Seaman, Ph.D.
Department Head
Digital+ Media Department (Graduate Division)
Rhode Island School of Design
Two College St.
Providence, R.I. 02903-4956
401 277 4956
fax 401 277 4966
bseaman@risd.edu
http://billseaman.com
http://www.art.235media.de/index.php?show=2
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.