Re: [-empyre-] Re: 2 wr[b]yte : oulipo

["Friedrich W. Block" <block@brueckner-kuehner.de>]

hi marcus,

as a fourth (or first) point I would add a lot of forms of ars combinatoria
and algoritmic writing like, e.g., proteus, permutation, baroque text
machines, dada-text-collage, oulipo-contraintes, numerical poems ... have a
look at florian's book, which I mentioned and which is working on this in
every detail.  

best

f

Am 12.10.2005 22:23 Uhr schrieb "marcus bastos" unter
<bastos.marcus@gmail.com>:


> 
> 1 (you have already pointed)
> Digital Writing that draws from Mallarmé, concrete and visual / sound poetry.
> (and explore combinations of word, visual, sound and programming)
> ------------->1a seek similar results as those already obtained in
> analogic media
> -------------> 1b share the same attitued of de-construction,
> exploring digital media possibilities
> 
> 2.
> DW that draws from Borges and Nouveau Roman
> (and focus on the possibiliteis of exploring of linkage processes to
> build vast rhizomatic texts)
> 
> 3.
> DW exploring the movement from 2-D to 3-D texts
> (I cannot think of a definition right, now, so follow some examples:
> a. Nous n´avons pas compris Descartes
> -http://www.andrevallias.com/poemas/index.htm#
> b. IO: http://www.andrevallias.com/poemas/index.htm#
> c. Econ http://www.pucsp.br/pos/cos/interlab/in4/entrada.htm)
> -------------> 3a Writing and Architecture, Writing for Public Spaces
> 
> do you agree with these axes? do you see any others?