Re: [-empyre-] precursors
- To: soft_skinned_space <empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au>
- Subject: Re: [-empyre-] precursors
- From: ian clothier <hybridia1@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 04:52:52 -0700 (PDT)
- Delivered-to: empyre@gamera.cofa.unsw.edu.au
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=RyAHI/rWdkYeC14JVOZGa622LfCDiyixIw7q0FhIux5148y8t035qLqbW712GjMyyvT071ih4gmCfzL9l2GlpuYJHg3Aye/Hm2Ot+hWhkyOsoiL+yHjJmiwFsq8/ra2OCSMheygy7LKDJPJ5DDROmZNKwKcwXNiJU2S5fJUbnzY= ;
- In-reply-to: <72319d6a0510141304g79f72229p@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: soft_skinned_space <empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au>
Newness is describable as novelty, and novelty
apparently is what drives generations forward. In this
sense not just some trumped up framework for
Euro-centric practice but something afflicting (sic)
us all. Novelty drives culture toward the unknown.
anonymouse
--- giselle beiguelman <desvirtual@gmail.com> wrote:
> bill,
> perfect
> you are wonderful.
> following your statements, i would introduce to you
> waldemar cordeiro.
>
[http://netart.incubadora.fapesp.br/portal/midias/catalogo.pdf/download
> (unfortunately the critical texts are not translated
> into english.
> btw, his images are so powerful. pay attention to
> 'the girl who is not
> B.B.')]
>
> and remember orson welles lessons. i think "citizen
> kane" and his
> radiophonic version for "the war of the worlds" are
> landmarks for the
> study of (new) media codes. don't you think so?
>
> 2005/10/14, Bill Seaman <bseaman@risd.edu>:
> > Hi Giselle and Jim,
> > Giselle, Hi, I agree there are really new
> > elements to the digital as you suggest that code
> > enables...
> >
> > **
> > Another precursor for me is Duchamp's Large Glass
> > and his related Green Box notes that function
> > like an algorithm that sets his Glass in motion.
> > In particular Hamilton's typographic version of
> > the Green Box is exquisite...
> >
> > b
> >
> >
> > >jim,
> > >amazing. we [always] agree.
> > >i love one quotation from borges.
> > >he says we are always creating our precursors
> > >
> > >2005/10/12, Jim Andrews <jim@vispo.com>:
> > > >
> > > > > From: giselle beiguelman
> > > >
> > > > > I think that we should keep in mind that
> what is interesting in
> > > > > History is that it is continuity *and*
> rupture.
> > > > > I agree with Friedrich when he states that
> we can not stress new
> > > > > futurist approaches and with the
> classification Marcus introduces in
> > > > > his post. In spite of that, I think it is
> important to recognize the
> > > > > novelty of the practices we are facing
> today.
> > > > > We are dealing with a code that is not only
> a transmission code but it
> > > > > is also executable. Because of this, it can
> affect material things
> > > > > (for instance: to set a machine into
> motion). Vernacular languages can
> > > > > persuade us but not execute actions.
> > > > > The example Friedrich used in another post
> -- Jaromil piece in p0es1s
> > > > > -- is a good example of this new situation
> which points, I believe, to
> > > > > new reading and writing practices. It seems
> to me that they don't have
> > > > > precedents in our cultural traditions.
> > > > >
> > > > > gb
> > > >
> > > > well said, giselle.
> > > >
> > > > i am not sure why the literary tends to be
> more conservative and slower to
> > > > innovate than visual arts. i recall reading
> > >ws burroughs saying that the cut
> > > > up technique was basically from visual arts
> from fifty years ago.
> > > > currently, in digital writing, publishers
> > >have been slower than galleries to
> > > > have much involvement on the net or in
> writing that is pressing forward
> > > > concerning digital writing. and we hear
> strong injunctions such as
> > > > friedrich's not to dare speak of anything
> being new.
> > > >
> > > > one can usually dig up precedents, however
> > >incomplete they are. i am fond of
> > > > william carlos williams quote from the
> fifties (or so) that 'a poem is a
> > > > machine made out of words' and apollinaire's
> words from his 1917 talk
> > > > L'Esprit Nouveau et les Poetès:
> > > >
> > > > "Typographical artifices worked out with
> great audacity have the advantage
> > > > of bringing to life a visual lyricism which
> was almost unknown before our
> > > > age. These artifices can still go much
> further and achieve the synthesis of
> > > > the arts, of music, painting, and literature
> ... One should not be
> > > > astonished if, with only the means they have
> > >now at their disposal, they set
> > > > themselves to preparing this new art (vaster
> > >than the plain art of words) in
> > > > which, like conductors of an orchestra of
> unbelievable scope they will have
> > > > at their disposal the entire world, its
> noises and its appearances, the
> > > > thought and language of man, song, dance, all
> the arts and all the
> > > > artifices, still more mirages than Morgane
> could summon up on the hill of
> > > > Gibel, with which to compose the visible and
> > >unfolded book of the future....
> > > > Even if it is true that there is nothing new
> under the sun, the new spirit
> > > > does not refrain from discovering new
> profundities in all this that is not
> > > > new under the sun. Good sense is its guide,
> and this guide leads it into
> > > > corners, if not new, at least unknown. But is
> there nothing new under the
> > > > sun? It remains to be seen."
> > > >
> > > > we read in apollinaire both an
> acknowledgement of the difficulties of
> > > > speaking of the new and also, nonetheless, a
> willingness to do so. that
> > > > strikes me as important. because the
> alternative is a kind of 'ipsi dixit'
> > > > atmosphere of 'proof by authority' in which
> > >it is viewed as futile to try to
> > > > say or do anything new.
> > > >
> > > > so your willingness to hazard to speak of the
> new is very welcome to my
> > > > eyes.
> > > >
> > > > ja
> > > > http://vispo.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> _______________________________________________
> > > > empyre forum
> > > > empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au
> > > > http://www.subtle.net/empyre
> > > >
> > --
> > Professor Bill Seaman, Ph.D.
> > Department Head
> > Digital+ Media Department (Graduate Division)
> > Rhode Island School of Design
> > Two College St.
> > Providence, R.I. 02903-4956
> > 401 277 4956
> > fax 401 277 4966
> > bseaman@risd.edu
> >
> > http://billseaman.com
> > http://www.art.235media.de/index.php?show=2
>
>
> --
> www.desvirtual.com
> http://netart.incubadora.fapesp.br/
> "
> _______________________________________________
> empyre forum
> empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au
> http://www.subtle.net/empyre
>
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.