Re: [-empyre-] reception

[marcus bastos <bastos.marcus@gmail.com>]

can I ask something first? Is there any kind of reading rules the user
should be aware of, before navigating? (e.g. Pignatari´s semiotic
poems have a 'reading key' that changes comprehension of the work; Jim
Rosenberg´s intergrams also have rules indicating the relationship of
one diagram to the other)

I am asking that because the dotted lines and arrows gave me the
impression that I should understand what was the relationship between
two different groups of texts, as if they were "words" of a "sentence"

On 10/23/05, Friedrich W. Block <block@brueckner-kuehner.de> wrote:
> dear friends,
>
> if you are interested in aspects of reception of digital writing I would be
> happy to read your thoughts about some questions.
>
> here is a brand new piece (digital writing in its pure sense, at least for
> me)
>
> http://plaintext.cc
>
> what do you think should a reader/user at least experience with this work?
> what should he or she know; which knowledge should be activated?
> which kind of reception / recipient does this text need?
>
> these 'good old' questions follow me for a longer time, not only for digital
> but also for other forms of experimental writing / art.
>
> best
>
> friedrich
>
> _______________________________________________
> empyre forum
> empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au
> http://www.subtle.net/empyre
>