[-empyre-] cultural interfacing
- To: empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au
- Subject: [-empyre-] cultural interfacing
- From: ryan griffis <grifray@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2005 12:44:28 -0500
- Delivered-to: empyre@gamera.cofa.unsw.edu.au
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:Mime-Version:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Message-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding:From:Subject:Date:To:X-Mailer; b=Bribr8z8tQjLqGxyvIDsm+FrFxscfqVMA5gejRDixjDZ7JK7REWAeLuA7/jUx0c2leU6gkIrFy3um2v1YiiMHWIcyCUG1yG4HU4REaws6dFbbCniw6F0nnWmC+PdwQk87qe0oJCtgyy6BUQaS3lQkunqoWYoTByycnKI01BHD9o= ;
- In-reply-to: <20050905020006.29CD7A14AB0@gamera.cofa.unsw.edu.au>
- References: <20050905020006.29CD7A14AB0@gamera.cofa.unsw.edu.au>
- Reply-to: soft_skinned_space <empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au>
Christina McPhee wrote:
So that you force into a tight juxtaposition the fact based
documentary, the Q and A, with a really direct GUI design that
probably runs well on 56k. I've always loved the apparent artlessness
of your online work, its really flat out, no frills, no bullshit
interface. Certainly this interface itself is an expression of the
Tijuana Calling theme, because your minimal style is super accessible
both artistically and in terms of bandwith...
i'm not sure about the characterization of Ricardo's interface design
as being "no frills"... there is certainly a minimalist quality that
kind of resembles graphic novels and the like, but i think there's a
baroqueness to them that is well beyond the minimum requirements for a
usable interface. maybe i'm reading christina's remarks the wrong way,
but the "flat out, no bullshit interface" qualification seems
misleading maybe. not that the interface is "bullshit" ;) but i
certainly wouldn't call it "no bullshit" either, as that seems to
suggest a lack of artifice, which i think is really present in
Ricardo's work. and by artifice, i don't mean "surface" or "falsity"
but certainly aesthetic and narrative.
but, perhaps this is really beside the point, the questions initiating
the discussion are the ones that seem more important to focus on...
considering how the net re-enacts geography is an interesting point of
departure, especially for projects like inSite and how those projects
will be discussed and framed through a channel like empyre.
i attended some of the pre-interventions events for inSite05 last year,
and made a small report based on my thoughts on some of these ideas:
http://www.yougenics.net/griffis/index.php?page=inSite
just yesterday, i was reading various blogs and on-the-ground accounts
from the US gulf coast, and came across a discussion about the alleged
killing of 5 contract workers by NOLA police as they crossed a bridge,
supposedly carrying weapons for protection. Someone posted this story
to an anarchist discussion board, linked to an Australian newspaper
site. then someone immediately commented that it was ridiculous to
consider a report from an Australian newspaper as accurate, due to its
geographic distance from the site in question. Of course, it turns out
that the story was from the AP. but the brief exchange pointed out some
interesting things in terms of the geographical underpinnings of the
network. A friend of mine thinks that we should expect a psychological
moving of the border north. i don't know about that, but i'm sure the
psychogeography of the US will be impacted by this.
best,
ryan
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.