[-empyre-] Re: empyre Digest, Vol 15, Issue 1
- To: empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au
- Subject: [-empyre-] Re: empyre Digest, Vol 15, Issue 1
- From: severn@acay.com.au
- Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 19:03:31 +1100 (EST)
- Delivered-to: empyre@gamera.cofa.unsw.edu.au
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <20060203010005.8190D140B606@gamera.cofa.unsw.edu.au>
- References: <20060203010005.8190D140B606@gamera.cofa.unsw.edu.au>
- Reply-to: soft_skinned_space <empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au>
- User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a-0.f0.9.6.legacy
greetings fellow empyryeans
Whilst I welcome a discussion on anti sedition laws and their possible
impact on artistic freedom, I am somewhat puzzled at the choice of guests.
It would beappropriate to include in the discussion at least one
Australian arts law specialist, someone with an informed position on the
proposed legislation; perhaps someone from NAVA, someone from ozco and
maybe one or two arts pollies.
Instead we are being led in this discussion by two USA people? Sorry, I
don't get it? Can't we form an opinion on this without being led by the
USA?
blakkbyrd
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.