[-empyre-] introducing Conor McGarrigle on "Bare LIfe" - introductory comments
dear -empyre-
Conor McGarrigle is joining us from Paris where he is living this
month. He's asked me to forward to you his initial reflections on
'what is bare life?"... these follow his short bio here.
--cm
Conor McGarrigle is a net artist based in Dublin. He is the founder
of online arts space Stunned.org . In 2002 as part of the Irish
Museum of Modern art project he started the net art open: the
uncurated open submission net art show in which all entries are
accepted. His art has dealt with themes of surveillance (Spook...) ,
identity (PLAY-lets) and art activism (IrishMuseumofModernArt.com),
often involving fictional identities with an element of prankstavism
never far away. He is currently working on an extended narrative
work about artists in Dublin based on Joyce's Ulysses (Cyclops,
Proteus episodes completed to date) and has recently developed an
interest in mapping resulting in Google Bono : a google maps /
surveillance camera mashup.
His work has been widely exhibited internationally including the
Seoul Net FEstival, File Sao Paolo, FILE RIO, Thailand New media arts
festival, Fundacio La Caixa Barcelona, SIGGRAPH, ReJoyce Festival
Dublin, Arthouse Dublin,Project Arts Centre Dublin, The City Arts
Centre and Intermedia Cork .
He is currently studying for an MFA at the National College of Art
and Design Dublin.
Introductory comments
First of all I would like to thank Christina for inviting me to
partake in this discussion, it's a great honour particularly to be in
such good company.
In reflecting on bare life the work of Georgio Agamben and his key
concept of Homo Sacer are unavoidable. Agamben bases his concept of
bare life on an obscure point of ancient roman law; when a condemned
person was banned from society and had their rights as a citizen
removed, thus becoming Homo Sacer, the living dead whose killing was
not a crime, excluded from the protection of the law but still
subject to the law, living in a state of exception. Obviously the '
unlawful combatants' of Guantanemo Bay, those subject to
'extraordinary rendition' and held in secret prisons around the world
stripped of all rights and at the mercy of the state of exception are
modern day Homo Sacer. There is even a school of thought which holds
that liberal democracy is a mask and that ultimately we are all Homo
Sacer.
What does this mean for art and in particular for the possibility of
political art? Around 2000 I was interested in surveillance online
culminating in my Spook... . Project. The central conceit was that it
placed a military server which had visited my site under surveillance
and was able to track where it had been on the web using very basic
techniques. While exposing the amount of data left behind as you
surfed Spook... implied that online surveillance was a two way
street and that such surveillance was a haphazard affair not to be
taken too seriously. What was a little naive even then today looks
like a charming period piece which raises questions about the role of
political art. It's obvious that political art is needed now more
then ever but how can we challenge this growth in the state of
exception, of rule by decree – think of all the special anti-
terrorism legislation being enacted all around the world –
artistically? On what criteria do we judge this art and would the
effort not be better spent in some sort of direct action that has a
better chance of being effective? These are questions I ask myself,
not questions that I raise just to be controversial and I look
forward to everyone's thoughts.
There is another more optimistic aspect to Bare Life. Agamben notes
that Bare Life is " a form of life over which power no longer seems
to have any hold" which opens up possibilities for a "lyrical or even
ecstatic" dimension. Colin McQuillan in his essay 'The Political
Life in Giorgio Agamben ' argues that Agamben "defines this politics
in terms of “a life directed toward the idea of happiness and
cohesive with a form-of-life” in which “the single ways, acts, and
process of living are never simply facts but always and above all
possibilities of life, always above all power.” and that “Agamben’s
conception of the political life is the result of a radical
rethinking of the potentiality of life, and life as
potentiality.”
I have had a long term interest in Joyce and Ulysses in particular
and have recently embarked on the (foolhardy) task of attempting a
series of narrative based works structurally based on the chapters of
Ulysses. This aspect of bare life seems to me to echo many of Joyce's
concerns or certainly that aspect of Joyce that I find of particular
interest.
While Joyce is often seen as the austere high priest of modernism it
is the humourous Joyce, the lyrical Joyce, the politically conflicted
Joyce who abhorred the absolutist position and most of all the Joyce
who believed that the highest form of art was to be found in the
everyday lives of ordinary people, that I find of most interest and
that informs my recent work. I am interested in the idea that by
focusing on simple everyday things like walking through a city, we
begin a process which clarifies what we do and how we relate to our
world and reveals greater truths about ways of being in the world.
It is of necessity an open ended process one for which the result is
not clear. For me this ties in with this dimension of bare life the
idea that stripping life down to it's essentials opens up new and
unexpected possibilities.
Which brings me to the idea that art can dissolve the “radical
separation between painful subjection and joyous liberation” . An
ambitious and honourable aim.. but can it be realised ? I look
forward to the debate.
On a personal note I'm doing this on what was going to be a computer
free break in Paris. I will be using internet cafes so my responses
will not be super fast and I apologise in advance.
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.