Re: [-empyre-] 'Bare LIfe' -- a lyrical and even ecstatic dimension



hi all,

I see football, or more precisely the act of watching football, as an
interesting lead into connecting much new media - net art especially -
to Agemben's concept of bare life in it's different forms. Football is
undoubtedly a cultural product, a multi-million euro business vital to
the profits of sportwear manufacturers and media empires, a top down
industry with the consumer at the bottom. A consumer whose only role
is to consume in the pre-approved manner?

I think that the message embedded into the image, like the camera angles, use of close-ups, editing techniques, like slow motion, determines the amount of space the consumer has. The camera techniques, the editing choices and the very vivid detailed HDTV image creates an more 'real' experience as if one is there. The message imbedded into the images was one of individualism an identification with an individual. I often found myself in the position of a voyeur having a sometimes to intimate view of the soccer players.
Lots of tattoo's!
The meaning of the broadcast was less about the game, then making the viewer or the consumer an accomplisher to the game and creating an very 'real' illusion of the bare live experience of the match. Herein I saw a difference with older broadcasts of the worldcup. One can argue that this is a inevitable evolution of the technology, namely, the image quality of the HDTV camera. (this world cup was the first wherein al the 25 camera's per stadium where of HDTV quality) I think that this does not have to be so. To give the consumer a choice, of camera angle, and the amount of close-ups would be an interesting art-project. A personalized viewing experience determined by one's desires. A potential interesting project as a hack, not as an institutional implimented possibility, because that would only lead to another marketing and surveillance tool.


I rather see watching football as more of a tactical activity as
described by Michel de Certeau in which the audience appropriate the
received space of the game and use it in a way that is meaningful to
them, often totally foreign to the intent of the producers.

I just finished a sound project on this received space of the game. it's a homage to the coffee-shop and the eclectic group of people gathering there to watch the match, laugh, and drink coffee. It was a very special experience, which was completely different then watching the game in Holland what I was used too.
I hope it is appropriate to but the weblink to this project in this email:
http://www.jackysawatzky.net/single_cappuccino


sincerely, Jacky


Football mania provides an interesting elision into the conditions of
'bare life' and mass ectasy and how this intercalates with the 'state
of exception,' don't you think?  Seems like that's your (and
Aliette's -- as another football commentator this week from Paris)
implication.







 Rather
than this being a contemporary roman games or opium of the people
designed to take the minds of the masses off the state of exception I
see as a product of this very state and watching football as one of
the many spaces that have been appropriated by the excluded and the
powerless. Tactics which are at the heart of so much new media art
today including my own work. I don't think it's an accident that the
real Luther Blisset was a footballer.




One of the aspects of the state of exception is the increasingly panoptic society we live in . Agamben refuses to travel to the US because he will not subject himself to the retinal scanning and fingerprinting required to enter the country because he feels that this would render him to a state of bare life. It was revealed recently that the Pentagon are funding research to data mine social networking spaces like myspace and connect this with their other datasources. When we look at the detail freely available in Google earth we can only imagine what level of detail is availably for military or security use add to this the unstoppable march of surveillance cameras and this is only what we know about. We are now all constantly exposed and, I feel, powerless to stop or reverse these trends how do we deal with it , how can we make art about it?

Tactical new media exposing the workings of the systems, using the
tools in subversive ways and intervening, often in small seemingly
inconsequential ways which have a cumulative effect, shows the way.
Think of plagiarist's SVEN, recently mentioned by Michelle, or
Michellt Terans Life a User's manual where she hacks into wireless
surveillance camera feeds using off the shelf gear or my own Spook...
which used unprotected server logs as a datasource or Google Bono
which has as it's raw material Dublin's traffic cams used in a way
that the city fathers would never have imagined. In de Certeaus work
he proposes that it is this tactical usage where "the imposed
knowledge and symbolisms become objects manipulated by practioners who
have not produced them" is the way in which it is possible to live in
intolerable situations and the way in which the weak and the powerless
can appropriate  a self made power which can't be controlled by the
powerful. In is this space that I see new media art being effective
and it opens new possibilities of making art.

all the best


Conor

all the best
_______________________________________________
empyre forum
empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au
http://www.subtle.net/empyre


http://www.jackysawatzky.net




This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and MHonArc 2.6.8.