[-empyre-] mobile media debate



Hello everyone,

I don't think the important issue here is whether mobile media have allowed for the development of multiple identities within the same person... that debate goes back to the early chatrooms where people could be who they wanted and have different identities at the same time. Besides I must have to agree that a stable, clearly defined and unified self is part of the modern ideology (as was already stated here), and being such, it is culturally defined and context dependent. It doesn't seem plausible that mobile media or the like have created the urge or need to have fluid identities... but this is another reminder that all those big narratives, perfect, all- encompassing modernist narratives are failing us and are being replaced by subjective, multiple accounts of reality and ourselves. It is not us who are different because of technology. Modernism has failed us in so many ways and this is just another one...

But despite this issue of unified versus multiple identities, and going back a bit to my previous post, we're developing a notion of space (and to a large extent due to mobile media) that is less defined by geographic features. Telegraphy, satellites and all ways of communicating through large distances have shortened space, but now it seems that it has become some sort of relational space defined by the number of available connections. The more connections available to you (through you mobile device for instance) the more central you are. The fewer connections (or the total absence of them by not having one of those devices) the more peripheric (outside of known space, a foreigner, banned, outcast...) one is. And this seems to be structurally different from the changes other ways of communicating have caused to the notion of space.

anyway, just my opinion

Best,
Luis Silva




This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and MHonArc 2.6.8.