dear list
back in the early nineties I spent a year in Lambda Moo, that was
before chat rooms, before browsers, when participants had to use
unix, and everything was command lines and text.
There was a lot of discussion about lambda's future and the
inevitable addition of images. It has come to pass and with it has
come a dumbing down of the participants as the interface becomes
easier to use.
In Lamda, to build, you had to use an object orientated programming language.
What I'm seeing now is a new generation of theorists trying to
re-invent the wheel. In forming a theory of second life, surely one
has to at least acknowledge Lambda's role and the considerable
amount of papers it inspired?
I havent done much in SL, its too much like "been there, done that"
for me, but I have complied a collection of posts on SL in
connection with my own research.
see
http://blakkbyrd.blogspot.com/search/label/Second%20Life
and there are videos here
http://www.youtube.com/my_playlists?p=5322BFAA7ECA62E9
regards
blakkbyrd
_______________________________________________
empyre forum
empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au
http://www.subtle.net/empyre