[-empyre-] Re: empyre Digest, Vol 43, Issue 2

[sdv at krokodile.co.uk]

Blakkbyrd,

the restrictive definition you offer of porn is worringly incorrect. Not 
withstanding these and the  other difficulties with heterosexual porn 
you would have to address whether non-male-heterosexual porn, gay/queer 
porn and so on is necessarily a spectacle of degradation before you 
could make such a claim.

s

blakkbyrd wrote:
>
> On 02/06/2008, at 4:00 AM, empyre-request at lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au wrote:
>
>>> If I had had time, I would've written something about the projects
>>> I've been working on, namely Sharing is Sexy [ http://sharingissexy.org
>>>  ] , which is a queer open source porn laboratory, which I see as a
>>> creative form of biopolitical resistance to control over bodies
>>> through the free proliferation of images of new genders and
>>> sexualities and through community building online and offline.
>>  lotu5
>
>
>
>
>
> Pornography is defined as "material that subordinates or degrades women"
>
> not a feminist then?
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> empyre forum
> empyre at lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au
> http://www.subtle.net/empyre
>
>