[-empyre-] Relational Aesthetics: Late-Comer and Parasite
Robert Summers
robtsum at gmail.com
Mon Jul 6 13:17:40 EST 2009
I agree with what Simon Biggs wrote; paraphrased, Derrida, Kisteva,
and others have articulated a *relational aesthetics* avant la lettre
-- and they have done so more profoundly and in ways that reach across
the humanities, but Bourriaud*s theory is stuck in the art market.
And, I think that what Johannes Birringer wrote is interesting. To
quote, *you just stopped short of saying that *relational aesthetics*
is parasitic.*
I want to think Bourriaud*s *relational aesthetics* parasitically, or
as a *parasitic theory* _and_ exploit the parasite -- put it to work,
otherwise. Further, I want to think it through *the parasite* that is
*queer theory* ... I mean, I see *queer theory* as a *parasite,* but
_not_ in they way Birringer means it toward Bourriaud*s theory. So,
what happens in the meeting of these different *parasites*? What can
be created? Of course we can *forget Bourriaud,* but I want to keep
*him* (really *his* theory, which is and is not his own) in order to
rethink-redeploy *his* theory in art, art productions and practices,
art history / criticism, the art market, etc. in order to *queer*
these various practices, disciplines, and institutions -- and
parasitically so. Hence, I wonder what a *parasitic practice* would
produce; I wonder what a *parasitic relational aesthetic* would look
like -- or do (possibly in its undoing). Are these of interest? Is
there a *line of flight* we can take here? Mentioning that
DeleuoGuattarian phrase, reminds me of what Deleuze states in
_Negotiations_, *I saw myself as taking an author from behind and
giving him a child that would be his own offspring, yet monstrous*
(6). So what monstrosity (or parasite or both) can be produced by
taking Bourriaud from behind? What *meta-parasite* can be produced in
a *perverse* union? Indeed, I want to think the parasite and all of
these back ways, these dorsal turns, these undoings, these *perverse*
entrances, these remappings in order to find *new* territory, a *new*
theory. Indeed, just wondering ....
-Robert
Robert Summers, PhD/ABD
More information about the empyre
mailing list