[-empyre-] Horit Herman Peled : Participatory Art
Timothy Murray
tcm1 at cornell.edu
Sun Jun 28 23:39:37 EST 2009
The digital revolution is not a revolution
anymore. Its revolutionary potential has long
been assimilated into the Capitalist form and
practice, as was that of the mechanical
revolution before it. Referring to the
relationship between workers and Capital in the
postindustrial era,
Slavoj<http://nosubject.com/Slavoj_%c5%BDI%25/C5BEek:Articles>
Zizek has claimed that " it is not workers who
are in excess, but the Capital itself"
(<http://www.lacan.com/zizbarabajal.html>http://www.lacan.com/zizbarabajal.html).
In the last two years, history gazes in
compliance and boredom at the crisis that has
struck the global village, triumphing Capital
over workers/humans and other living beings. Yes,
the digital revolution did hold on its animated
wings a new hope for the empowerment of the
individual artist, as well as the multitudes,
through the reinstituting of autonomy. A
perpetuum mobile utopia was partially realized
through the abundance of tools and the new
perspectives on time and space. However, in
"reality," utopia was interwoven into the
economic surface, enhanced by digital
technological engines sailing into imaginative
terrains painted with Capital excess.
The new, detached brave world assembled openings
loaded with opportunities. However, it needed a
discourse to accompany the new era. The art
field, among others, satisfied that need, in part
through the endeavor of Participatory Art, which
allowed for the fusion of body/mind/place/trace,
expanding the horizons of the art works. The
critical dimension of Participatory Art could be,
and partially was, added to it through
digitality, which narrated its politics. It is
there where a shift could transpire in the
relationship between humans\nature and Capital.
The Critical curved a trajectory from Hegel's
assertion of the end of art to Benjamin's idea of
the change in the basis of the art object, from
the commercial to the political. However,
contradictions still exist on the digital
artistic plane encapsulating the
human/nature/Capital symbiosis.
Digitalism facilitated the capabilities for
blending place, body and the virtual. Critical
place. It is here that the emancipatory potential
of engaged artistic activity lies.
participatory art demands that these facilities
be employed in specific places where the homo
sacer dwells. Participatory performance in these
places follows the traces - signs absence,
anchored of the absence of presence. Emerging
from the participatory art-in-situ tradition,
through the virtual critical participatory art
becomes the presence of the in a
Horit Herman Peled is an artist and theorist,
teaches new media and theory at the Art Institute
at Oranim College in Israel. Exhibited at the
Venice Biennale 2003, The Utopia Station Lab in
Martha Rosler's Trojan Horse.
<http://www.performanceparadigm.net/category/journal/issue-3/>http://www.performanceparadigm.net/category/journal/issue-3/
<http://www.horit.com/>http://www.horit.com
--
Renate Ferro and Tim Murray
Co-Moderators, -empyre- a soft-skinned-space
Department of Art/ Rose Goldsen Archive of New Media Art
Cornell University
More information about the empyre
mailing list