[-empyre-] Revison

[Saul Ostrow]

Having once embraced our  (our compliance) - might we ask: first, what it is that we are participating in and secondly, does our being in  "collusion" (cooperative)  give us a rhetorical (commendable) position  to advance (toward an objective) - or are we forever limited to making tactical  moves within the domain (episteme, habitus) we occuppy, rather than being able to formulate  strategic and self critilcal goals - It would seem to me   that  the promise of our complicity lies in the former rather than the latter


On 1/9/10 7:02 PM, "Sean Cubitt" <scubitt at unimelb.edu.au> wrote:

Having once embraced our complicity - might we ask: first, what it is that we are participating and secondly, how our how does our being in  "collusion" (cooperative) might give us a rhetorical (commendable) position  to advance (objective) - or are we forever limited to making tactical  moves within the domain (episteme, habitus) rather than  strategic ones - and doesn't our complicity lie in the former rather than the latter

--

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://mail.cofa.unsw.edu.au/pipermail/empyre/attachments/20100109/a9d339a1/attachment.html