[-empyre-] The Power of Nightmares

Simon Biggs s.biggs at eca.ac.uk
Wed Mar 31 22:21:38 EST 2010


That is one possible response.

Best

Simon


Simon Biggs

s.biggs at eca.ac.uk  simon at littlepig.org.uk  Skype: simonbiggsuk
http://www.littlepig.org.uk/
Research Professor  edinburgh college of art  http://www.eca.ac.uk/
Creative Interdisciplinary Research into CoLlaborative Environments
http://www.eca.ac.uk/circle/
Electronic Literature as a Model of Creativity and Innovation in Practice
http://www.elmcip.net/



From: Adrian Bowyer <A.Bowyer at bath.ac.uk>
Reply-To: soft_skinned_space <empyre at lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 11:17:45 +0100
To: soft_skinned_space <empyre at lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au>
Subject: Re: [-empyre-] The Power of Nightmares

I would have thought that one obvious action to take would be to
organize a mass attendance at this 8 April meeting to make the
collective view extremely loudly heard (if one can hear a view...).

Best wishes

Adrian

Dr Adrian Bowyer
http://people.bath.ac.uk/ensab
http://reprap.org



Simon Biggs wrote:
> Hi Christiane
> 
> It¹s not news in academia here either. As in the States academia has
> been split since 9/11 and people have had to make difficult decisions as
> a result. However, it is news in the arts.
> 
> This isn¹t about government agencies seeking to co-opt academics working
> in the physical or social sciences (corrupt as that is) but trying to
> draw independent artists in as well. Within the Scottish context this is
> particularly sensitive. They have just abolished the independent
> Scottish Arts Council and replaced it with a quango made up of
> government appointees and industrialists called Creative Scotland. A key
> person behind that is the person responsible for this email requesting
> artists to contribute to anti-terror (I read that as illegal war of
> aggression) activities. The implication is that artists who choose to be
> involved will receive government largesse.
> 
> Corrupt?
> 
> Best
> 
> Simon
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From: *Christiane Robbins <cpr at mindspring.com>
> *Date: *Mon, 29 Mar 2010 10:25:50 -0700
> *To: *Simon Biggs <s.biggs at eca.ac.uk>, soft_skinned_space
> <empyre at lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au>
> *Subject: *Re: [-empyre-] The Power of Nightmares
> 
> Hi Simon -
> 
> Sadly, this is not news to many professors in the States, especially
> since 9/11 and especially to those on the faculty of Research 1
> Universities.  It has proven to be the basis of critical issues for
> several I know and they have struggled ( actually suffered  ) for the
> past decade or so.  Some have left the academy for this very reason and
> others remain - each as their conscience sees fit.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Chris
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Mar 28, 2010, at 5:35 AM, Simon Biggs wrote:
> 
>     Hi all
>      
>      Please see the thread from the Ambit list below. It is incredibly
>     disturbing. This government official hasn¹t a clue how artists think
>     and operate ­ and yet they are apparently the Deputy Director of
>     Culture for the Scottish government! It is like having Dick Cheney
>     running Amnesty! It is so unbelievable it crossed my mind it is a
>     hoax but this person is indeed who they say they are and seems to be
>     seeking to co-opt artists into a morally bankrupt war of aggression
>     founded on an arrogant imperial foreign policy enforced domestically
>     through a corrupt and corrupting home security apparatus. In the
>     best of times artists are obliged to rip up the rule book and turn
>     over the furniture but in this context we are obliged to do more.
>     How does the artist act responsibly in this context and contest such
>     insidious actions? What artistic interventions might now be appropriate?
>      
>      The second section of the thread presents a text documenting how
>     anthropologists previously responded to attempts by the authorities
>     to similarly co-opt their discipline. The url it points to offers
>     more detailed documentation and background. Whilst I agree entirely
>     with their logic and conclusions I wonder whether the actions they
>     proposed to take in response had any effect. The fact that their
>     deliberations and actions pre-date the Scottish Executive email
>     below by a good period of time shows that they made no difference.
>     What would?
>      
>      Best
>      
>      Simon
>      
>      
>      Simon Biggs
>      
>      _simon at littlepig.org.uk_  Skype: simonbiggsuk
>      _http://www.littlepig.org.uk/ <http://www.littlepig.org.uk/>
>      
>     _ ------ Forwarded Message
>      *From: *Variant <_variantmag at btinternet.com_>
>      *Date: *Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:39:20 +0000
>      *To: *<_ambit at lists.a-r-c.org.uk_>
>      *Subject: *[Ambit] The Power of Nightmares
>      
>      *Militarisation of 'creativity' in Scotland : moral and ethical
>     dilemmas concerning the integrity of creative practitioners
>      *
>      "how creativity can help in the study of terrorism and forensic
>     science and in how the outcome or story from that is told"
>      
>      ...Firstly, let me introduce myself: I'm Wendy Wilkinson and I head
>     up the Culture Division in the Scottish Government. As well as all
>     things culture, my remit also includes the creative industries...
>      
>      However, I'm emailing about a quite separate matter. And it may
>     appear rather bizarre, but bear with me. I'd like to invite you to
>     an informal meeting I'm arranging on 8 April, at my office in
>     Victoria Quay, Edinburgh. And it's to brainstorm/discuss how
>     creativity can help in the study of terrorism and forensic science
>     and in how the outcome or story from that is told. This stems from
>     work that Brian Lang, former principal of St Andrews University, is
>     doing to arrange a conference joining up the centre for study of
>     terrorism at St Andrews university, with the forensic science centre
>     at Strathclyde university and the centre for terrorism at the
>      University of Central Oklahoma. Brian and I are both keen to
>     explore how creativity can contribute and we recognised the first
>     step would be to consult our own creative talent here in Scotland.
>     hence my invite. I am planning to invite a couple of people from the
>     computer gaming industry and perhaps a writer or artistic director,
>     so a small group and it would be attended by Brian and the President
>     of the University of Central Oklahoma who is over here for a visit
>     then.  
>      
>      I do hope that you can attend and would be grateful if you could
>     let me know what time you may be available on the 8th.
>      
>      kind regards
>      
>      Wendy Wilkinson
>      Deputy Director: Culture
>      Scottish Government
>      Victoria Quay
>      Edinburgh EH6 6QQ
>      
>      
>      
>      
>      
>      Anthropologists' Resistance to Militarisation
>      
>      The project [OCombating Terrorism by Countering Radicalisation¹]
>     ³provoked a furious response from academics², mainly
>     anthropologists, ³who claimed it was tantamount to asking
>     researchers to act as spies for British intelligence² (Baty 2006).
>     James Fairhead, who works for the ESRC¹s Strategic Research Board
>     and on its International Committee, declared it is appalling that
>     these proposals were not discussed in any of these committees
>     (quoted in Houtman 2006). Opposition to the project grew
>     significantly after the plans were published in the Times Higher
>     Educational Supplement. As a result, it was withdrawn before its
>     closing date on November 8th 2006.
>      _http://www.sussex.ac.uk/anthropology/documents/marrades.doc
>     <http://www.sussex.ac.uk/anthropology/documents/marrades.doc> _
>      
>      
>      The eleven originators of the Pledge are deeply concerned that the
>     "war on terror" threatens to militarize anthropology in a way that
>     undermines the integrity of the discipline and returns anthropology
>     to its sad roots as a tool of colonial occupation, oppression, and
>     violence.  We felt compelled to draft the Pledge to say that there
>     are certain kinds of work<for example, covert work, work
>     contributing to the harm and death of other human beings, work that
>     breaches trust with our research participants, and work that calls
>     other anthropologists into suspicion<that anthropologists should not
>     undertake.  In many ways we are restating the position that Franz
>     Boas famously articulated in 1919.  We encourage you to sign the
>     Pledge as a way to support this position on ethical work in the
>     discipline and as a way to make a statement to government and
>     military officials, the social science and other scientific
>     communities, and the broader public that that anthropologists will
>     not participate in such work or support wars of occupation.
>      _http://sites.google.com/site/concernedanthropologists/faq_
>      
>      "A soldier whose business is murder as a fine art, a diplomat whose
>     calling is based on deception and secretiveness, a politician whose
>     very life consists in compromises with his conscience, a business
>     man whose aim is personal profit within the limits allowed by a
>     lenient law -- such may be excused if they set patriotic deception
>     above common everyday decency and perform services as spies. They
>     merely accept the code of morality to which modern society still
>     conforms. Not so the scientist. The very essence of his life is the
>     service of truth. We all know scientists who in private life do not
>     come up to the standard of truthfulness, but who, nevertheless,
>     would not consciously falsify the results of their researches. It is
>     bad enough if we have to put up with these, because they reveal a
>     lack of strength of character that is liable to distort the results
>     of their work. A person, however, who uses science as a cover for
>     political spying, who demeans himself to pose before a foreign
>     government as an investigator and asks for assistance in his alleged
>     researches in order to carry on, under this cloak, his political
>     machinations, prostitutes science in an unpardonable way and
>     forfeits the right to be classed as a scientist." (Franz Boas, in a
>     letter to The Nation, 1919)
>      
>      Workshop of Military Anthropology in the UK
>      We find other, smaller-scale examples of universities and their
>     academics seeking to cash in on ³terror research² by offering their
>     knowledge as a source of ³protection.² One example involves the
>     ³Culture in Conflict Symposium² at the Defence Academy of the United
>     Kingdom, on 16 ­ 17 June 2010
>     <_http://www.cranfield.ac.uk/cds/symposia/cic10.jsp
>     <http://www.cranfield.ac.uk/cds/symposia/cic10.jsp> _>. It includes
>     a Workshop on ³Spatial Sociocultural Knowledge² (read human terrain)
>     and followed by a one-day Military Anthropology Workshop. There is
>     no clearer expression of the way academics have become comfortable
>     players in the pyramid scheme of war corporatism than when they call
>     themselves ³military anthropologists.²
>      _http://zeroanthropology.net/_
>      
>      Protests against British research council: "Recruits
>     anthropologists for spying on muslims"
>      A few weeks ago the Association of Social Anthropologists of the UK
>     and Commonwealth (ASA) passed a resolution that criticized a huge
>     British research program that recruits anthropologists for
>     ³anti-terror² spying activities, and anthropologist Susan Wright
>     (Danish University of Education) called for global coordination on
>     this issue.
>      
_http://www.antropologi.info/blog/anthropology/2007/protests_against_british_res
earch_counci
>     
<http://www.antropologi.info/blog/anthropology/2007/protests_against_british_res
earch_counci>
>     _
>      _______________________________________________
>      a m b i t : networking media arts in scotland
>      post: _ambit at a-r-c.org.uk
>      _archive: www.a-r-c.org.uk/ambit <http://www.a-r-c.org.uk/ambit>
>      
>      ------ End of Forwarded Message
>        
>      
>     Edinburgh College of Art (eca) is a charity registered in Scotland,
>     number SC009201
> 
>       
>       _______________________________________________
>     empyre forum
>     empyre at lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au
>     http://www.subtle.net/empyre
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Edinburgh College of Art (eca) is a charity registered in Scotland, number
SC009201
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> empyre forum
> empyre at lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au
> http://www.subtle.net/empyre


-- 
_______________________________________________
empyre forum
empyre at lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au
http://www.subtle.net/empyre


Edinburgh College of Art (eca) is a charity registered in Scotland, number SC009201


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://mail.cofa.unsw.edu.au/pipermail/empyre/attachments/20100331/295720e2/attachment.html 


More information about the empyre mailing list