[-empyre-] Cambridge and Paris
Jean-baptiste Labrune
labrune at media.mit.edu
Mon Oct 11 18:35:44 EST 2010
Dear Lorna,
Thanks for your messages, this looks like a great event ! I would love
to follow it on the web and read a recension of the event later on, do
you have any pointers for that ?
You highlight how it is important for you and the organisers of this
event to discuss and experiment, and to define an aesthetic encounter,
in a shared environment. Could you explain a little bit how this event
was curated and especially why the organisation was not an open proces
(where a large audience and not a close amount of curators could
discuss, experiment and share) ?
As you mention: "At the colloquium in Paris we are proud and honored
to present our keynote speaker as Bernard Stiegler. (..) his activist
political society Ars Industrialis is trying to change the world...
see http://arsindustrialis.org/ "
I am very happy for you to be proud to change the world, but in that
case, proud for proud, why not invinting Rancière himself ? Did he
refuse to join such a project ? What would be his take on this
initiative ?
Being in Paris or in Cambridge is great not only to "encounter"
aesthetic representations but also embodied symbolic machines like
Latour, Stiegler, Rancière (and the ghosts of the Cultural Studies
haunting institutions through their students). When you talk about the
"autonomous space opened by the artwork" how do you deal with the
necessary situated (à la Lucy Suchman) politi that authorized
(authored) this space ? Maybe when you "encounter" an artwork in
Paris nowadays, you meet as well the curators and the socio-political
conditions that allowed its manifestation rather than chatting with
Levinas...
To have organised some events there in the past, I know that
criticising is easy and that it is always simpler to decide in advance
than to deconstruct ad-infinitum (french yack shaving ). However,
opening the curation / organisation to public forae (like in
scientific conference where you have a Call for Organisation not only
a Call for Participation) maybe would open the discussion and give an
alternative to the power of a curated agonistic discourse where the
arguments and their critic are bounded by the socio-material
conditions of event organisation - that create a format not far from
the space between to advertisements - hence controlling the critical
discursive space (the classics : we only have time for 3 questions,
because we took a little bit more time this morning let's talk over
lunch, etc, etc).
Yep, curation constitutes social order, and Pompidou is a curation
machine, in the long french discretionary/aristocratic tradition.
Making sense while in the heart of the power fountain is always an art
form that implies humour, since sense and political justifications
live usually in different planets. In the other Cambridge where I
studied - and another power center that combines softly french and
british establishment traditions - sense making is more about spinning
out any form of alternative to non-curated critics, à la Bernays. Will
your event be able to perceive itself and escape the temptation of
being hypnotised by its production or its guest list ?
Cheers,
Jb
Le 11 oct. 10 à 07:22, Lorna Collins a écrit :
> Dear Patty, dear all,
>
> Making Sense is more about discussing and experimenting with these
> problematics rather than having a teleological definition to set them.
> The point is to use the arts to open a way of thinking that traverses
> many disciplines and media to bring forward a constructive and
> accessible sense of the real. We do this from the rhyzomatic
> connections made between different presentations, media and
> individuals at the colloquia, which open up a creative interface for
> difference, which we then publish (this will happen in Paris, online
> or in the second book) and extend.
>
> To define the aesthetic encounter -- this means the experience of
> encountering or interacting with an artwork. The encounter is
> immediately a passive phenomenological experience where you are
> touched by an artwork. It is then about the conscious experience of
> reacting to this artwork. We can think of the encounter in terms of
> Rancière's notion of the 'partage du sensible', the distribution of
> the sensible, which refers to the situation of an encounter -- what
> you can sense, who can sense it, where it is, and how you can
> articulate a response to it. Then the aesthetic encounter is
> political. The aesthetic encounter takes place in the autonomous space
> opened by the artwork. The aesthetic refers to an artwork, which can
> have any form or medium. The artwork is something that is made in
> response to a situation, i.e. it is the object (which can take any
> form) of the expression or an articulation of the artist. We are all
> artists.
>
> "How does the change implied from "encounter" differ in function from
> the change implied in "intervention" or "mobilization"?" I think that
> intervention and mobilization refer to ways of engaging with the
> encounter and installing its manifest implications. An encounter can
> be passive -- your senses are stimulated and touched by an artwork.
> (cf. Jean-Luc Nancy on sense and touch here) You don't have to do
> anything except receive the stimulus opened by the artwork. The
> content of this experience, and what the artwork expresses, then opens
> an interface which can provide an intervention or be mobilized. This
> is what we are trying to do with Making Sense.
>
> At the colloquium in Paris we are proud and honored to present our
> keynote speaker as Bernard Stiegler. He writes about the inherent,
> ex-tatic technology and prostheses that define the human, whilst his
> activist political society Ars Industrialis is trying to change the
> world... see http://arsindustrialis.org/
>
> Lorna
>
> 2010/10/10 Patricia R. Zimmermann <patty at ithaca.edu>:
>> Lorna:
>>
>> Could you explain in theoretical and practical terms your idea of
>> how Making Sense facilitates "aesthetic encounters."?
>>
>> What is the theory of an "aesthetic encounter"?
>>
>> How does your group define "aesthetic"?
>>
>> And, how does your group define "encounter"?
>>
>> How does the change implied from "encounter" differ in function
>> from the change implied in "intervention" or "mobilization"?
>>
>> Thanks in advance for sharing any thoughts on the above based on
>> your experience in Making Sense.
>>
>> Patty
>>
>> -------
>> Patricia R. Zimmermann, Ph.D.
>> Professor, Cinema, Photography and Media Arts
>> Roy H. Park School of Communications
>> Codirector, Finger Lakes Environmental Film Festival
>> Division of Interdisciplinary and International Studies
>> 953 Danby Road
>> Ithaca College
>> Ithaca, New York 14850 USA
>> Office: +1 (607) 274 3431
>> FAX: +1 (607) 274 7078
>> http://faculty.ithaca.edu/patty/
>> http://www.ithaca.edu/fleff
>> BLOG: http://www.ithaca.edu/fleff10/blogs/open_spaces/
>> patty at ithaca.edu
>>
>>
>> ---- Original message ----
>>> Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 08:55:29 -0400
>>> From: empyre-bounces at gamera.cofa.unsw.edu.au (on behalf of Renate
>>> Ferro <rtf9 at cornell.edu>)
>>> Subject: [-empyre-] Cambridge and Paris
>>> To: soft_skinned_space <empyre at gamera.cofa.unsw.edu.au>
>>>
>>> Lorna Collins wrote:
>>>
>>> .......We want to analyse and discuss the aesthetic encounter and
>>> an art
>>> practice as a medium that can help us make sense of the world. We
>>> bring together artists and philosophers, scholars and students,
>>> thinkers and writers, from all around the world, to build an
>>> interface
>>> between artistic creation, theoretical debate and academic
>>> scholarship. At the colloquium we want to formulate new ways to
>>> frame
>>> and develop discourse, and found a new way of making sense, which
>>> can
>>> challenge and invigorate the protocol, regulation and system of
>>> academia. This is a different kind of conference – there is no
>>> hierarchical division between the plenary speakers and the audience,
>>> we have an economy of mutual exchange and intimate debate. This
>>> Colloquium.......
>>>
>>> Good Morning Lorna, Thanks for giving us a general overview of
>>> your own
>>> philosophy and the history of the Making Sense Colloquium. I'm
>>> wondering if
>>> you could talk about the event being held at the Pompidou in
>>> Paris? Do you
>>> have a mission for this event that might be slightly different
>>> that the
>>> Cambridge event in 2009? Was there a publication that cam out of
>>> the
>>> Cambridge event or what kind of information was gathered that
>>> perhaps has
>>> informed the event in Paris? The statement above is so broad so I'm
>>> wondering if you have defined the Paris event differently based on
>>> what
>>> happened in Cambridge?
>>>
>>> Lorna will be introducing two of the Visiting Artist's who will be
>>> featured
>>> in Paris later today but I'm hoping that she will give us more of
>>> a sense of
>>> the event's history so that perhaps that would give our empyre
>>> subscribers a
>>> idea of the underpinnings of potential discussion points.
>>>
>>> Thanks Lorna. Renate
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/10/10 12:34 AM, "Lorna Collins" <lpc29 at cam.ac.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear Renate,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the intro! I’d like to say a bit about Making Sense…
>>>> This
>>>> is the second interdisciplinary colloquium of Making Sense. The
>>>> first
>>>> was held at the University of Cambridge in 2009. At these events we
>>>> want to analyse and discuss the aesthetic encounter and an art
>>>> practice as a medium that can help us make sense of the world. We
>>>> bring together artists and philosophers, scholars and students,
>>>> thinkers and writers, from all around the world, to build an
>>>> interface
>>>> between artistic creation, theoretical debate and academic
>>>> scholarship. At the colloquium we want to formulate new ways to
>>>> frame
>>>> and develop discourse, and found a new way of making sense, which
>>>> can
>>>> challenge and invigorate the protocol, regulation and system of
>>>> academia. This is a different kind of conference – there is no
>>>> hierarchical division between the plenary speakers and the
>>>> audience,
>>>> we have an economy of mutual exchange and intimate debate. This
>>>> colloquium can be seen as an artistic creation or installation in
>>>> itself. I think we can all be artists. Participants are
>>>> encouraged to
>>>> react and articulate their opinion.
>>>>
>>>> How does this fit into my own work? I am neither specifically a
>>>> writer, nor artist, nor philosopher, but use these genres
>>>> simultaneously to make sense of the world, to discover my place
>>>> within
>>>> it, and to think about what might threaten our most basic need to
>>>> inhabit it. I use art to write philosophy, and I use philosophy to
>>>> inspire the plastic forms of art I make; in between my visual,
>>>> intellectual and phenomenological experiments I hope to invent a
>>>> practical, accessible method for ‘making sense’.
>>>>
>>>> I take academic theory to the creative resources of practising
>>>> art, in
>>>> the efforts to challenge and invigorate the political scholarship
>>>> of
>>>> academic discourse through the basic, replenishing and regenerative
>>>> facets of creativity. In this sense I am perhaps a diplomat and
>>>> curator who seeks to arrange and mobilise the emancipatory
>>>> interface
>>>> that art can offer everyone, whilst trying to confirm and cement
>>>> this
>>>> chance in the more formal terms of academia.
>>>>
>>>> This is the kind of ethos that lies behind Making Sense the
>>>> collective, which is the emerging group of artists and philosophers
>>>> who came to the first and are coming to the second colloquium.
>>>> Making
>>>> Sense is bigger than singular events. We are trying to start a
>>>> movement. The Making Sense project, beyond the colloquia, is
>>>> ultimately about founding a communitarian practice, through art,
>>>> that
>>>> provides a restorative social act. It would be very interesting to
>>>> discuss what that means and how it might be possible…
>>>>
>>>> I look forward to hearing your thoughts...
>>>>
>>>> Lorna
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2010/10/10 Renate Ferro <rtf9 at cornell.edu>:
>>>>> Welcome to our October discussion, ³Contextualizing Making
>>>>> Sense. The
>>>>> alignment of criticality and configurations of embodiment and
>>>>> space permit
>>>>> creative flows of networks, resources, research and discussions
>>>>> whose
>>>>> configurations prove limitless.
>>>>>
>>>>> Lorna Collins and her team of collaborators have invited Tim and
>>>>> I to
>>>>> represent empyre this month at the ³Making Sense Colloquium² at
>>>>> the
>>>>> IRI-Centre Pompidou, Institut Télécom the 19th and 20th of
>>>>> October.
>>>>> http://www.makingsensesociety.org/ <http://www.makingsensesociety.org/
>>>>> >
>>>>> Lorna is a theorist and a PhD student at the University of
>>>>> Cambridge where
>>>>> she is a Foundation Scholar at Jesus College. Her academic
>>>>> research pushes
>>>>> to forge the development of Making Sense via her research and
>>>>> writing but
>>>>> also through various events such as the ³Making Sense²
>>>>> colloquium. The
>>>>> colloquium brings together a wide variety of international
>>>>> theorists and
>>>>> artists some of whom will be our guests this month on empyre.
>>>>>
>>>>> Both independently and collaboratively, Tim and I have worked
>>>>> between the
>>>>> spaces of theory and practice for many years. Through Tim¹s
>>>>> international
>>>>> curating as well as his work in founding and directing the Rose
>>>>> Goldsen
>>>>> Archive for New Media Art and in my case the founding and
>>>>> directing of The
>>>>> Tinker Factory, an interdisciplinary lab for research and
>>>>> practice we have
>>>>> independently found venues for forging theory and practice.
>>>>> Together our
>>>>> collaboration with empyre has given us an opportunity to
>>>>> investigate the
>>>>> negotiations between theory and practice historically in May
>>>>> 2009 our
>>>>> discussion Critical Motion Practice merged intersections that
>>>>> entailed both
>>>>> self-reflective and interactive movement at the intersections of
>>>>> art,
>>>>> choreography, architecture, activism and theory. Again in
>>>>> September, 2007
>>>>> our discussion on Critical Spatial Practice highlighted themes
>>>>> of social
>>>>> responsibility at cross-disciplinary intersections. The
>>>>> questions we asked
>>>>> revolved between the technological and critical approaches
>>>>> between practice
>>>>> and theory and how those questions empowered creativity,
>>>>> enhanced artistic
>>>>> activism and encouraged artistic/performance practice and
>>>>> collaboration.
>>>>>
>>>>> We are looking forward to joining the Making Sense participants
>>>>> and
>>>>> anticipate the international online discussion that will evolve
>>>>> with our
>>>>> 1400 subscribers. Each week we will highlight a handful of
>>>>> Making Sense
>>>>> guests in hopes that their own project descriptions will entice
>>>>> our members
>>>>> to add their own ideas and comments.
>>>>>
>>>>> Together collaboratively we are hoping to open up the discussion
>>>>> of Making
>>>>> Sense. As an artist my practice involves instincts, whim,
>>>>> research, reading,
>>>>> discussion, investigation and critical analysis. When a research
>>>>> thread
>>>>> ³makes sense² I assume that my inquiry is finished and the
>>>>> project is
>>>>> finished a cue to proceed to the next. The act of ³Making
>>>>> Sense² implies a
>>>>> search for resolution. Though in the process of making it is the
>>>>> uneasiness, the questioning, the restlessness, the point that is
>>>>> not making
>>>>> sense that excites me to continue. Welcome to ³Contextualizing
>>>>> Making
>>>>> Sense² or not?
>>>>>
>>>>> We would like to welcome Lorna Collins as our first guest. We
>>>>> will begin
>>>>> this month on empyre by asking Lorna to answer a few questions
>>>>> for our
>>>>> -empyre members. Can you fill us in a bit more about your own
>>>>> work as it
>>>>> relates to the Making Sense Colloquium? Additionally what can
>>>>> we expect
>>>>> from the forum itself coming up in a few weeks?
>>>>>
>>>>> Renate and Tim
>>>>>
>>>>> Renate Ferro
>>>>> URL: http://www.renateferro.net
>>>>> Email: <rtf9 at cornell.edu>
>>>>> ,
>>>>> Visiting Assistant Professor of Art
>>>>> Cornell University
>>>>> Department of Art, Tjaden Hall
>>>>> Ithaca, NY 14853
>>>>>
>>>>> Co-moderator of _empyre soft skinned space
>>>>> http://www.subtle.net/empyre
>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empyre
>>>>>
>>>>> Art Editor, diacritics
>>>>> http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/dia/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> empyre forum
>>>>> empyre at lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au
>>>>> http://www.subtle.net/empyre
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> empyre forum
>>> empyre at lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au
>>> http://www.subtle.net/empyre
>> _______________________________________________
>> empyre forum
>> empyre at lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au
>> http://www.subtle.net/empyre
>
>
>
> --
> Lorna Collins
> PhD Candidate: "Making Sense; art practice as a social act"
> Jesus College
> Cambridge
> CB5 8BL
> http://web.me.com/lornacollins/
> http://www.makingsensesociety.org./
> _______________________________________________
> empyre forum
> empyre at lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au
> http://www.subtle.net/empyre
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Labrune
MIT Media Lab
20 Ames St E14-464C
Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
http://web.media.mit.edu/~labrune/
More information about the empyre
mailing list