[-empyre-] Sense as space
naxsmash
naxsmash at mac.com
Mon Oct 25 14:54:07 EST 2010
Alexander
Moi aussi, I am involved in glyphlike topologic drawings http://www.christinamcphee.net/category/drawing/
in my shed /teorema series 2010. growing out of the 'tesserae of
venus' attempt to model climate change as a personal/physical
measurement of wonder. I am reposting quotes from your post below to
facebook and twitter. very succinct. thanks, and hi Sergio, as
always-often we are in sync.
c
naxsmash
naxsmash at mac.com
christina mcphee
http://christinamcphee.net
On Oct 24, 2010, at 5:49 PM, sergio basbaum wrote:
> Alexander,
>
> Thank you for you beautiful message.
>
> Most of my work in the last years have been exploring different
> aspects of the multiple meaning of the word "sense", as body
> apparatus, direction and meaning, with a merleau-pontian inspiration.
>
> I'm happy to read what your doing, there's alot of common intuitions.
>
> best vibes from Brazil
> s
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 9:01 PM, Alexander Wilson <01ek at parabolikguerilla.com
> > wrote:
> Hello Empyrecists,
>
> Thanks Renate for introducing me to the list. Though I have not yet
> posted, I have been following the discussions for a couple of weeks
> now.
>
>
>
> I'd like to write down a few thoughts, post Making Sense Colloquium,
> and hope they may spark some new tangent discussions.
>
>
>
> A lot of my theatre and art work has dealt with the idea that sense
> as in meaning and sense as in sensation, is inherently tied to a
> third homonym, at least with the french word "sens" : sense as
> direction or orientation. This lead me to conceptualize sense as
> space, space which is not only physical and through which our bodies
> move, but a heterogeneous space that also includes psychological
> space, that is, spaces through which our minds move. Sense as
> meaning and sense as sensation are etymologically derived from the
> idea of earlier words meaning "to find ones way" or "to orient
> oneself" (see proto indo-european base *sent-, which means "to go").
> So spatiality is extremely important if we want to look at sense
> holistically.
>
>
>
> If both are minds and our body are in sense, that is, if they orient
> themselves within sense in a holistic manner, then we must think of
> the mind and body as one entity. I have often used the term
> “topological body” to refer to this, though it is somewhat
> misleading. The idea comes from the topology of non-orientable forms
> in topology, like the mobeius strip and the klein bottle, the
> definitions of which give us a way of thinking how the outside,
> physical world, could be continuous to the internal mental world. If
> one were to stand on a gaint klein bottle's surface, one might get
> the impression that the ground on which he stands has an other side,
> below his feet, as it were, when in fact this “other side” is
> continuous to the “side” he is standing on : the klein bottle only
> has one side. Likewise, the topological body only has one side. The
> inside mental space of the subjet extends continuously into the
> physical world outside. The topological body is thus both mind and
> body.
>
>
>
> In my work with Parabolik Guerilla Theatre, I have often treated the
> question of the difference between “having sense”, that is, merely
> being determined by the space in which the topological body is
> embeded, and “making sense”, that is actively participating in the
> constant reorganization of that space. Merleau-Ponty wrote about the
> difference between parole parlée and parole parlante in this way.
> It is possible to “use” language in a non creative way, whereas it
> is also possible to create through language, to reveal through
> language something other than what a word means on a merely semiotic
> level. This creative use of language is poïesis. But this
> distinction between having sense and making sense extends to areas
> which we don’t usually call language : gestures also adhere to this
> principle. The body is constantly involved in automatic gestures, it
> relies on innumerable unconscious gestures that “make” no sense but
> "have" sense, that is, the body is on constantly decoding sense
> which is already there, inscribed in the repetitive processes which
> make up our present, inherited from the past. However, there are
> ways in which the body can attempt to become poïetic, and take part
> in new encodings of sense, create new propagating processes,
> revealing new meanings, new ways to move, new ways to interact with
> the world (or be the world).
>
>
>
> In our practice with Parabolik Guerilla Theatre, Japanese Butoh has
> been a huge inspiration, and from the very beginning was part of our
> physical training regimen. Butoh deals with exactly this idea of
> transcending the usual gestural and postural automatisms that are
> only decodings of sense. It is and active attempt to not be
> determined by sense, but actually take part in producing it. The
> idea of a topological body and of sense as space also ties in with
> butoh’s sense of the body and space, where the exterior and interior
> are incessantly forced to exchange places. A common interpretation
> of butoh is that in it’s practice, the body no longer moves through
> space but that the reverse is happening, the space moves through the
> body.
>
>
>
> I could go on and on about these ideas but I’m already rambling.
> Renate said at Making Sense colloquium to try to keep our posts
> short, so I’ll shut-up for now...
>
>
>
> thanks,
>
> alexander wilson
>
>
> --
> Alexander Wilson
> http://www.parabolikguerilla.com
> http://www.encodagesdeloubli.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> empyre forum
> empyre at lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au
> http://www.subtle.net/empyre
>
>
>
> --
> -- Prof. Dr. Sérgio Roclaw Basbaum
> -- Coord. Tecnologia e Mídias Digitais
> -- Pós-Graduação Tec.da Inteligência e Design Digital - TIDD (PUC-SP)
> _______________________________________________
> empyre forum
> empyre at lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au
> http://www.subtle.net/empyre
More information about the empyre
mailing list