[-empyre-] Reclaiming creativity as agent of change

[Lisa Cianci]

Hi Rachel,
I have you down as a 'P' (50%) for assessment task 1 (it was a late 
submission), but I'm not sure what result you got for the second 
assessment task with Karl.
Just CCing this message to him too so he can check the status of your 
assessment.
Will let you know.
Cheers,
Lisa


  /\./\
( -.- )
c(")(")
//------------------------------
// lisa cianci
// www.blackaeonium.net
//------------------------------


On 19/07/11 11:41 PM, Saul Albert wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 11:09:33AM +0100, Simon Biggs wrote:
>> The jester worked up close and dirty with authority, right by the
>> monarch's side, but often in conflict with them.
> Mongrel http://www.mongrel.org.uk/ used the word 'motley' to describe
> their social/technical cultural practice and group identity.  It's a
> word derived from the mixed colours of the 16th C court jester's
> clothes, which was also used to describe colourful naval uniforms of the
> 'motley crew'. It has a literary heritage as the heroic or anti-heroic
> group, facing adversity using their varied skills and characteristics.
>
> This seems to be an integral part of the figure of the pirate: a heroic,
> oppositional posture, flagrantly adopting the ethos of nomadic
> pragmatism that Jussi brought up earlier via Rosi Braidotti.
>
> The discussion so far has outlined the ontology of the posture:
> kingdoms, republics, corporations and unions that adopt this ethos
> become 'vandals'. The moral archetype must remain embattled.
>
> 'Autonomous' practices may adopt similar strategies, but unopposed
> pirate practices have nothing to 'reclaim'. Infrastructure art may be
> very interesting, but only becomes sexy when it gets in trouble.
>
> Mongrel remained embattled by being embattled, not seeking opposition,
> but encountering it in language, technocracies, and the operations of
> the markets it was involved with, and its own motley subjectivity.
>
> This is not to say that dandy pirates are gentrifying the discourse.
> It's to say that Lulz did the right thing by melting away in the face of
> opposition. Not getting caught was a great strategy. So far at least.
>
> I was really disappointed to hear about the Danish government banning
> the operations of the Copenhagen Free University.
> http://www.nettime.org/Lists-Archives/nettime-l-1106/msg00079.html
>
> My disappointed wasn't because they were banned, I was disappointed that
> they came out of victorious retirement to announce their re-instatement
> in the face of opposition. The CFU had shown a thousand pirate
> universities how to take power simply through motley self-institution.
> http://copenhagenfreeuniversity.dk/sisuk.html The Free U Resistance
> Committee of June 18 2011 were the first to frame this as an intention.
>
>
> X
>
> Saul.
>